2021
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.259010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo imaging shows continued association of several IFT-A, IFT-B and dynein complexes while IFT trains U-turn at the tip

Abstract: Flagellar assembly depends on intraflagellar transport (IFT), a bidirectional motility of protein carriers, the IFT trains. The trains are periodic assemblies of IFT-A and IFT-B subcomplexes and the motors kinesin-2 and IFT dynein. At the tip, anterograde trains are remodeled for retrograde IFT, a process that in Chlamydomonas involves kinesin-2 release and train fragmentation. However, the degree of train disassembly at the tip remains unknown. Two-color imaging of fluorescent protein-tagged IFT components in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that anterograde to retrograde remodelling does not require specialized machineries of the ciliary tip. In Chlamydomonas , the constituents from one anterograde train appear to split into two or three retrograde trains, with IFTA and IFTB complexes remaining associated during anterograde to retrograde conversion 39 . Together, this supports a model in which conversion occurs through conformational changes pre-built into the anterograde train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that anterograde to retrograde remodelling does not require specialized machineries of the ciliary tip. In Chlamydomonas , the constituents from one anterograde train appear to split into two or three retrograde trains, with IFTA and IFTB complexes remaining associated during anterograde to retrograde conversion 39 . Together, this supports a model in which conversion occurs through conformational changes pre-built into the anterograde train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the major reported target of ICK and CDPK1 is kinesin-2 (Chaya et al, 2014; Liang et al, 2014), which is proposed to dissociate from the IFT train upon phosphorylation (Liang et al, 2014). Kinesin-2 dissociation may initiate the major conformational change that IFT trains undergo as they convert to retrograde trains (Chien et al, 2017; Jordan et al, 2018; Stepanek and Pigino, 2016; Wingfield et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C. elegans , tracking experiments show that IFT-A and IFT-B components have different dwelling times at the ciliary tip, suggesting that IFT-trains are broken into separate IFT complexes (Mijalkovic et al ., 2018). However, recent work on Chlamydomonas show that IFT-A, IFT-B and IFT dynein subcomplexes stay associated through the switch from anterograde to retrograde IFT at the ciliary tip (Wingfield et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%