1998
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo measurement of changes in venous blood‐oxygenation with high resolution functional MRI at 0.95 Tesla by measuring changes in susceptibility and velocity

Abstract: High-resolution functional imaging experiments at 0.95 Tesla have been performed to determine the changes in oxygen saturation in pial veins during motor activation by measuring both flow and susceptibility changes in the blood. Averaging across subjects, mean values for the change of the oxygenation level, deltaY = 0.16 +/- 0.08 (n = 7) and deltaY = 0.13 +/- 0.09 (n = 4), were obtained from the susceptibility sensitive and the flow sensitive acquisitions, respectively. The results suggest that the increase in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting Y values were not significantly different from the corresponding measured values (P = 0.48). We further noted that although we adopted the group mean arterial oxygenation of 98% for these calculations, coinciding with commonly assumed values (Hoogenraad et al, 1998), our observations were robust against physiologically plausible variations in arterial oxygenation. For Y a varying between 96 and 100%, the resultant fractional uncertainties DCMRO 2 and C were both within B10%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The resulting Y values were not significantly different from the corresponding measured values (P = 0.48). We further noted that although we adopted the group mean arterial oxygenation of 98% for these calculations, coinciding with commonly assumed values (Hoogenraad et al, 1998), our observations were robust against physiologically plausible variations in arterial oxygenation. For Y a varying between 96 and 100%, the resultant fractional uncertainties DCMRO 2 and C were both within B10%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…and Ref. 13). This time-dependent intravascular phase term (⌿ iv ) will cause a beat between the intravascular NMR signal (S iv ) and the extravascular NMR signal (S ev ), causing the magnetization in the voxel to vary in amplitude (S) and phase (⌽).…”
Section: Vector Model Of the Bold Signalmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The major contributors to the BOLD signal that have been discussed are represented in vector form in Fig. 2a, adapted from the work of Hoogenraad et al (13). Because of the symmetry of the extravascular magnetic field perturbation (cos2 term in Eq.…”
Section: Vector Model Of the Bold Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, in voxels embedded in vascular compartments, and , where act indicates "on activation", rest indicates "on rest", is the susceptibility difference between fully oxygenated and deoxygenated blood and Hct is the fractional hematocrit in the vein. The latter relation was used for the estimation of functional oxygenation changes in large veins of the visual cortex and in pial veins of the motor cortex in humans (Haacke et al, 1997;Haacke et al, 1995;Hoogenraad et al, 1998). The 2013 study was performed at 2.5 mm isotropic resolution, and involved removal of non-local phase effects.…”
Section: Potentials and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%