2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02918.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Study of the Survival of Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp. bulgaricus CECT 4005T and Streptococcus thermophilus CECT 801 by DVC‐FISH after Consumption of Fermented Milk

Abstract: Direct Viable Count (DVC) method has been recently combined with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for the specific detection of viable cells of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CECT 4005T and Streptococcus thermophilus CECT 801. This method has been used to determine their in vitro viability to gastrointestinal juices, being the resistance of L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus 26.2% and 9.2%, respectively. On the other hand, an in vivo study has been carried out with the ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports indicated that the viable cell numbers of S. thermophilus in yogurt were higher than those of L. bulgaricus [15] [16] [24], and bacterial cell numbers of L. bulgaricus in yogurt were increased by stirring during fermentation [25]. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that bacterial cell numbers of L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus in yogurt depend on cultivation time and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Previous reports indicated that the viable cell numbers of S. thermophilus in yogurt were higher than those of L. bulgaricus [15] [16] [24], and bacterial cell numbers of L. bulgaricus in yogurt were increased by stirring during fermentation [25]. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that bacterial cell numbers of L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus in yogurt depend on cultivation time and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Values obtained after the whole gastrointestinal simulation were of the same order as those reported for other lactic‐acid bacteria, such as L. delbrueckii spp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus inoculated in a lactic substrate, with mean cumulative viabilities around 26.2% and 9.2%, respectively (García‐Hernández et al ., ), or Lactobacillus reuteri inoculated in raw and fried tomato, with mean cumulative viabilities around 24% and 26.3%, respectively (García‐Hernández et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…salivarius after both the gastric step (%VIAB ST1 ) and the intestinal step (%VIAB ST2 ) were calculated as the ratio in percentage between the number of living cells leaving and entering each step. In accordance with this, the probiotic resistance to the entire simulated gastrointestinal digestion (%VIAB TOTAL ) was calculated from the product of probiotic viabilities obtained for each of the two steps making up the process (García‐Hernández et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The in vitro method that simulates the gastrointestinal tract is of great interest to find out whether microorganisms can survive through it (García-Hernández et al, 2012). Before subjecting the bacteria to the effects of the gastrointestinal juices, plate counts from the initial dilution were performed in triplicate, being the result 2.80 x 10 9 (5.84 x 10 8 ) cfu / ml of L. reuteri.…”
Section: Effect Of Gastrointestinal Conditions and Tomato Antioxidantmentioning
confidence: 99%