2012
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivostudy of the surgical anatomy of the axilla

Abstract: Variations in axillary anatomical structures are common. Poor understanding of these variants can affect the adequacy of oncological clearance, lead to vascular injury, compromise planned microvascular procedures and result in chronic pain or numbness from nerve injury. Surgeons should be aware of the common anatomical variants to facilitate efficient and safe axillary surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same cannot be said for the LTA, which was absent in 45% of the cases evaluated. Most commonly, drainage of the LTV into the axillary vein anteromedial to the TDP was observed, confirming the findings of Khan et al (2012). However, in all of the cases studied, there was no communication between the LTV and the subscapular vein before the axillary vein was reached.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same cannot be said for the LTA, which was absent in 45% of the cases evaluated. Most commonly, drainage of the LTV into the axillary vein anteromedial to the TDP was observed, confirming the findings of Khan et al (2012). However, in all of the cases studied, there was no communication between the LTV and the subscapular vein before the axillary vein was reached.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They were chosen due to its potential of variability, identified and referred to as described in Gray’s anatomy atlas (Standring 2008) and in previously published articles that have addressed this subject (Loukas et al 2006; Khan et al 2012; Nadkarni & Raina 2006; Macéa & Fregnani 2006). To obtain a better understanding, ICBN was divided into three distinct anatomical structures: the first ICBN, identified from the second intercostal space, at the top of the axilla, originating in the second intercostal nerve (T2); the second ICBN, identified from the third intercostal space and originating in the third intercostal nerve (T3); and the third ICBN, identified from the fourth intercostal space in the caudal region of the axilla and originating from the fourth intercostal nerve (T4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These landmarks are constantly well seen in all our cases during axillary dissection. However, there is an aberrant course of the TDN in some reported series, which is not detected in our series [3]. …”
Section: Clinical Anatomycontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The ICBN was identified as a single trunk at its origin in 93.3% of the cases dissected. The description of this pattern ranged from 74% to 81.3% in other studies 8,10,14,28 . In this study, the average diameter of the ICBN at its origin in the second intercostal space was 2.1 ± 0.7 mm, similar to the result of 1.89 ± 0.44 mm described by Zhu et al 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%