2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.09003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivothickness measurement of basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis with optical coherence tomography and 20-MHz ultrasound

Abstract: OCT appears more precise and less biased than HFUS for thickness measurement in AK and BCC lesions < 2 mm, but both OCT and especially HFUS tended to overestimate tumour thickness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
154
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
154
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation of the penetration depth as baseline value for therapy monitoring was significantly better with 50 MHz and higher than with 20 MHz. In a current study by Mogensen et al [4] an overestimation of the histological penetration depth in comparison of OCT and ultrasound was stated. This was, however, even more distinctive in OCT than in ultrasound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation of the penetration depth as baseline value for therapy monitoring was significantly better with 50 MHz and higher than with 20 MHz. In a current study by Mogensen et al [4] an overestimation of the histological penetration depth in comparison of OCT and ultrasound was stated. This was, however, even more distinctive in OCT than in ultrasound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…US has been used in the diagnosis of skin tumors, connective tissue diseases, vascular disorders, and subcutaneous processes [3] as well as to measure the thickness of skin [4][5][6][7][8]. A reliable differentiation between benign melanocytic nevi [9], and melanomas is not possible with clinical ultrasound [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All nonmelanoma skin cancer lesions appeared hypoechogenic in HFUS, suggesting that this method alone is not suitable from differential diagnosis. [44][45][46] However, it gives a clear picture of the size and depth of the tumor. The method should be used as a complementary method in preoperative evolution of the tumor.…”
Section: High Frequency Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMSC includes keratinocyte carcinomas, the most prevalent cancer type in humans, and some more rare skin cancers. In NMSC diagnosis, OCT can potentially reduce the number of invasive skin biopsies, assist in finding an optimal location for a biopsy or measure tumor thickness [206]. However, despite many promising initial results in research, OCT has not yet been established in clinical dermatology.…”
Section: Dermatologymentioning
confidence: 99%