2012
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.17.12.126021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivovalidation of quantitative frequency domain fluorescence tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FD measurements have been made in phantoms using gain-modulated intensified CCDs (Godavarty et al 2003, 2005, Joshi et al 2006, Ge et al 2008, Kim et al 2010 as well as modulated PMTs (Eppstein et al 2002, Lee andSevick-Muraca 2001). In animals, there have been two reports of fluorescence tomography from FD measurements using a gain-modulated ICCD (Darne et al 2012) and PMTs (Lin et al 2011(Lin et al , 2012.…”
Section: Frequency-domain Time-dependent Measurements For Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FD measurements have been made in phantoms using gain-modulated intensified CCDs (Godavarty et al 2003, 2005, Joshi et al 2006, Ge et al 2008, Kim et al 2010 as well as modulated PMTs (Eppstein et al 2002, Lee andSevick-Muraca 2001). In animals, there have been two reports of fluorescence tomography from FD measurements using a gain-modulated ICCD (Darne et al 2012) and PMTs (Lin et al 2011(Lin et al , 2012.…”
Section: Frequency-domain Time-dependent Measurements For Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlights of time-dependent and -independent fluorescence small animal tomography Despite time-dependent methods offering the most complicated instrumentation, key demonstration of their successful adaptation into conventional scanners have been shown to be feasible. In a study performed by Lin et al (2012), 100 MHz FD measurements based upon a network analyzer and single PMTs coupled to the animal surface (figure 12(a)) were used to reconstruct images of a tube containing 52 μmol of indocyanine green embedded in the abdomen of a rat. While it is unclear whether homodyne or heterodyne measurements were conducted, lifetime and absorption cross section of ICG was reconstructed (i) without a priori information, (ii) using fluorescence measurements normalized with measurements made at the incident excitation wavelengths, and (iii) using the endogenous optical property maps obtained from independent measurements made with DOT.…”
Section: Examples Of Implementation and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also assumes that the imaged animal remains stationary as the quality of the corrected measurements using this method highly depends on the ability to immobilize the animal during this period between the two data acquisitions (Zhang et al 2018). Moreover, keeping the same experimental settings for both measurements is an additional challenge as gain settings are set only when the fluorescent agent is injected (Lin et al 2012a). In addition, when using targeted fluorescent probes that require a long circulation period, generally over 10 h, to accumulate in tumours, this method is useless due to the difficulty of replicating the exact same experimental settings to acquire before and after injection data (Ardeshirpour et al 2014(Ardeshirpour et al , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have demonstrated that integrating structural a priori information derived from a high resolution anatomical imaging modality such as computed tomography (CT) and MRI can improve the resolution and quantitative accuracy of the recovered fluorescent source in bioluminescent (BLT) and fluorescent tomography (FT) [2933]. In fact, functional a priori information derived from DOT has also been shown to improve image performance by estimating optical scattering and absorption coefficients [34,35]. In addition to improving the reconstruction by providing a priori information, integration with anatomical imaging modalities or non-traditional functional imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can also provide a much needed cross-validation of the optical information [3641].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%