1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004196001521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

l-1 summability of multiple Fourier integrals and positivity

Abstract: Let f∈L1(ℝd), and let fˆ be its Fourier integral. We study summability of the l-1 partial integral S(1)R, d(f; x)= ∫[mid ]v[mid ][les ]Reiv·xfˆ(v)dv, x∈ℝd; note that the integral ranges over the l1-ball in ℝd centred at the origin with radius R>0. As a central result we prove that for δ[ges ]2d−1 the l-1 Riesz (R, δ) means of the inverse Fourier integral are positive, the lower bound being best possible. Moreover, we will give an l-1 analogue of Schoenberg's modification of Bochn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem can be formulated equivalently in terms of summability and positivity for Fourier series and Bessel integrals, and we refer to Kuttner [14], Golubov [10], Misiewicz and Richards [20], Berens and Xu [3], and Zastavnyi [35,36] for these relations. The univariate case, n = 1, has an interesting history and dates back to the works of Wintner [32] and Kuttner [14] (see [9] for a more detailed discussion).…”
Section: The Kuttner-golubov Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem can be formulated equivalently in terms of summability and positivity for Fourier series and Bessel integrals, and we refer to Kuttner [14], Golubov [10], Misiewicz and Richards [20], Berens and Xu [3], and Zastavnyi [35,36] for these relations. The univariate case, n = 1, has an interesting history and dates back to the works of Wintner [32] and Kuttner [14] (see [9] for a more detailed discussion).…”
Section: The Kuttner-golubov Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Koldobskiǐ's [12] and Zastavnyi's [34] solution to the Schoenberg problem implies that k n,α (λ) is finite if (i) n = 1, α ∈ (0, ∞], λ ∈ (0, 2); (ii) n ≥ 2, α ∈ (0, 2), λ ∈ (0, α]; (iii) n ≥ 2, α = 2, λ ∈ (0, 2); and (iv) n = 2, α ∈ (2, ∞], λ ∈ (0, 1]; and infinite otherwise. Numerical values of k n,α (λ) are known in special cases only: k n,2 (1) = (n + 1)/2 (Golubov [10]); k 2,2 (1/2) = 1 (Pasenchenko [23]); k n,1 (1) = 2n − 1 (Berens and Xu [3]); and k 2,∞ (1) = 3. Furthermore, various estimates are known.…”
Section: · α -Dependent Positive Definite Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If : j =; j =&1Â2, then $ 0 =0 and the condition $>$ 0 becomes simply $>0. This extremal case corresponds to the l 1 summability of the multiple Fourier series or integral (see [5,6]), which is in sharp contrast with the usual radial (that is, l 2 ) means of the multiple Fourier series or integrals (cf. [19]).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The set of all these functions will be denoted by 8 d (:). Functions of type (1) are called radial with respect to the l : -norm, or :-radial for short. Due to Bochner's famous theorem :-symmetric characteristic functions can be interpreted as positive definite :-radial functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%