2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2012.668717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2-optimal identification of MIMO errors-in-variables models from the v-gap geometrical interpretation

Abstract: An L 2 -optimal identification method is extended to cope with MIMO errors-in-variables (EIV) model estimation based on a geometrical interpretation for the v-gap metric. The L 2 -optimal approximate models are composed of system and noise models and characterised by a normalised right graph symbol (NRGS) and its complementary inner factor (CIF), respectively. This metric can be evaluated as the supreme of sine values of the maximal principal angles between NRGS frequency responses of two concerned models. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the vast difference in computational complexity between these two LMI problems, the computational efficiency of the FPLS algorithm is much higher than that of the SLMI algorithm. Moreover, superior to the SQP algorithm proposed in [19], the FPLS algorithm needs no selection of appropriate initial values for parameter initiation. The computational efficiency of these three algorithms will be further compared with a simulation example given in Section 4.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the vast difference in computational complexity between these two LMI problems, the computational efficiency of the FPLS algorithm is much higher than that of the SLMI algorithm. Moreover, superior to the SQP algorithm proposed in [19], the FPLS algorithm needs no selection of appropriate initial values for parameter initiation. The computational efficiency of these three algorithms will be further compared with a simulation example given in Section 4.…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the parametrization of the approximate model P . /, the generalized orthonormal basis functions are applied in the following way [19,30]:…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations