Laparoscopic Colectomy: Complications Causing Reoperation or Emergency Room/Hospital Readmissions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of complications causing reoperation or emergency room(ER)/hospital readmission after laparoscopic colectomy (LC). We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively managed database of 358 patients undergoing LC. Nonhand assisted LC was jointly performed by two surgeons assisted by a general surgery resident. Trochar site fascial wounds larger than 5 millimeters were not closed for the first 283 cases, mesenteric defects were not closed. Forty-one patients (11%) required reoperation. Of the 19 hernias (17 incisional, 2 mesenteric), seven caused early postoperative obstructions either within the first week of surgery or within 4 days after discharge. Twelve hernias presented in a delayed fashion and were repaired months later. Eight hernias occurred at trochar sites, nine at specimen extraction sites, and two were in the mesenteric defect. There were eight adhesive small bowel obstructions, five were treated with early reoperation. Other causes included perforations in six cases (2%), anastomotic leak in seven cases (2%) and bleeding in two cases (0.5%). Fifty-nine (16%) separate patients required evaluation in the ER. Fifty-three patients had one ER visit, six patients had two. Causes included nausea and vomiting in 19 cases (5%), wound infection in 16 cases (4%), pain in 13 cases (4%), fever in five cases (1%), thrombosis in four cases (1%); 46 were admitted to the hospital, 70 per cent were discharged within 4 days. Eleven per cent of patients required reoperation after LC, usually for hernias or adhesive small bowel obstruction. Fifty-three per cent of the hernias could have been avoided by routine closure of the fascia. An additional 16 per cent of patients required ER evaluation for complications. Of these, 78 per cent were admitted, 70 per cent were discharged within 4 days. LC is not without potential complications and is not necessarily a less morbid operation.

Causes and Prevalence of Unplanned Readmissions After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

“…Although 13 articles were initially identified as eligible for this review, one study was excluded because of overlapping study samples . Results from the studies reported in the 12 eligible studies were pooled in the meta‐analysis …”

Patient experience with discharge instructions in postdischarge recovery: a qualitative study

“…Our status as a referral centre may account for the higher proportion of patients in our sample undergoing colorectal surgery for malignancy compared with patients undergoing colorectal surgery at other facilities in the USA. 30 31 Although this impacts the generalisability of our results, older patients with malignancy are an important subgroup of surgical patients to examine given their increased risk for adverse postdischarge events, including unplanned readmissions. 18 32 The rates of ostomy placement in our sample are similar to previously published studies.…”

Emergent Laparoscopic Colectomy Is an Effective Alternative to Open Resection for Benign and Malignant Diseases: a Meta-Analysis

“…The following reasons may adequately explain such inconsistency: firstly, other surgery-related complications (such as intestinal fistula and anastomotic leakage) resulted in an increased number of operative complications in the EOC group. Previous research [28] demonstrated that 3.6 % of serious complications needing reoperative after colonic resection were intestinal fistula or anastomotic leakage, but only 0.5 % were intra-abdominal bleeding. Unfortunately, such important parameters could not be extracted from included studies.…”