1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.3023617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Scattering in Planetary Atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
151
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflection effect calculations were based on Sobolev (1975) and Charbonneau et al (1999). We assumed that the transiting planet was small compared to its host star, and so did not take fully into account the gradient in the stellar brightening with radius when calculating the stellar brightness blocked by the planet during transit.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflection effect calculations were based on Sobolev (1975) and Charbonneau et al (1999). We assumed that the transiting planet was small compared to its host star, and so did not take fully into account the gradient in the stellar brightening with radius when calculating the stellar brightness blocked by the planet during transit.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical depth is the integral of the extinction coefficient, α ν , along the line of sight from the surface (r surf ) to infinity (Sobolev 1975).…”
Section: Integration Over Altitude Wavelength and Emission Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our physical parametrization for light scattering in a dusty atmosphere follows that of Sobolev (1975). It is assumed that light scattering can be parametrized in terms of extinction, a, single scatter albedo, h, and phase function, P. Extinction, a, describes the fraction of photons which interact with the host medium per unit path length; it is related to host medium number density, n, total cross section (for scattering and absorption), tr, the host medium mass density, p, and mass per host medium particle, m, by the relations a = no, = ptr/m.…”
Section: Physical Assumptions For Model Coma and Mathematical Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%