2019
DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living Emergency: Israel's Permit Regime in the Occupied West Bank. By Yael Berda. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations of the specific dynamics of state violence and ongoing dispossession are essential for an interrogation of power and expression of solidarity with those in struggle. Colonialism's violence structures space (Fanon, 1965, p. 38) in everyday encounters with bureaucrats and soldiers, at checkpoints and markets (Abowd, 2014; Berda, 2017; Hammami, 2019; Peteet, 2017; Rubaii, 2019; Siegman, 2020). It structures gendered and interreligious relations and reshapes geographies.…”
Section: Decolonizing Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations of the specific dynamics of state violence and ongoing dispossession are essential for an interrogation of power and expression of solidarity with those in struggle. Colonialism's violence structures space (Fanon, 1965, p. 38) in everyday encounters with bureaucrats and soldiers, at checkpoints and markets (Abowd, 2014; Berda, 2017; Hammami, 2019; Peteet, 2017; Rubaii, 2019; Siegman, 2020). It structures gendered and interreligious relations and reshapes geographies.…”
Section: Decolonizing Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state's control over non-citizen Palestinians changed dramatically in 1991, when free movement was severely curtailed through a new control mechanism, the permit regime (Berda 2017). Established as a reaction to the First Intifada, 4 this regime required that Palestinians obtain work permits to enter Israel, which were subject to extensive controls and easily revoked; moreover, they severely limited Palestinians' ability to move between employers, ''binding'' each worker to a specific employer (with the threat of revocation if terms are violated; Shalev 2017).…”
Section: Background: Israel's Ir System and The Construction Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In return for payment, Palestinian workers acquire (informal) mobility, which increases their power and economic inclusion (interview 13) and reflects the (neo)liberalization of sectoral employment relations. As Adnan and Etkes (2019) showed, this practice improves workers' (gross) wages; however, it also increases their precarity, making them dependent on labor intermediaries and payment of recruitment fees (which reduces net wages) as well as violating the rules of the permit regime, which may result in their exclusion (with the denial of an entry permit) (interviews 11 and 12; see also Berda 2017). One worker noted, ''[With the permit in hand] I get better wages and I can change employers .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Africa's apartheid pass law system, as a colonial technology and socio-legal apparatus, laid the foundation for, and has been positioned in relation to, a number of contemporary regimes of racialised labour and movement control globally. Similar to South Africa, the state of Israel's permit regime has its foundations in British Mandate colonial policy (Berda, 2017), and parallels have been drawn 'between the South African "pass laws" and the permit regime that the State of Israel uses to classify, track, and control the movement of Palestinians from the occupied territories' (Clarno, 2017: 4). Hahamovitch (2013: 18) has detailed how South Africa's pass law regime provided a blueprint for a variety of 'guest worker' programmes across the Global North, where states in North America and Europe adopted temporary visa programmes in order to manage 'the desire to admit immigrant workers and the urge to expel them'.…”
Section: No Pass Laws Here! As Analyticmentioning
confidence: 99%