“I’m a Heritage Speaker of the Damascene Dialect of Arabic”: Negotiating the Identity Label of Arabic Heritage Language Learner

Abstract

Utilizing an ecological perspective of heritage language learner (HLL) identity (Hornberger & Wang, 2008), this study investigates how an underexamined group within HLL studies—language learners with diverse ties to the Arabic language—perceive the label of HLL and how they position themselves and their classmates relative to this label during interviews and in an advanced Arabic language classroom. I draw on interview, observational, and videotaped classroom interaction data collected as part of a larger ethnographic study of this classroom community and show how a priori educational labels assigned to these students did not always match with their self-concepts and ignored the nuances of their relationship to the umbrella term “Arabic.” These labels also affected students’ classroom roles, self-esteem, and participation in the classroom. I examine the implications of educational classifications and assigned identities that are constructed by stakeholders such as researchers, teachers, or administrators, rather than negotiated by the language learners themselves, and critique Arabic HLL as an identity and educational classification. Finally, I offer some suggestions for how to engage language learners (HLLs if they choose to identify themselves as such) in critical discussions about their relationship with the language of study.

Standardisation and heritage language maintenance: preliminary interdisciplinary considerations with a case-based approach

“…For instance, Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) is mainly a written language used in formal situations or in media broadcasts, while local variants of the various regional Arabic dialect groups are preferred in daily oral communication. Therefore, there has been some debate on whether Arabic as a heritage language should take the form of local variants or of MSA (Nic Craith 2006, Hillman 2019. Indeed, few programmes of colloquial Arabic as heritage language have actually been successfully received by users (Caubet 2001: 268).…”