2019
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1574712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I’m more aware now”: perspectives from people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), supporters and counsellors about the MAXCOG cognitive rehabilitation intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining studies were predominantly pre‐post evaluations, or observational studies. Nine studies used mixed methods evaluation methods (Allan et al, 2019; Berwig et al, 2020; Chenoweth et al, 2016; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, Morgan‐Trimmer, et al, 2019; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, & Woods, 2019; Jennings et al, 2018; Lu et al, 2016; Øksnebjerg et al, 2019; O'Sullivan et al, 2015), and four studies used qualitative methods (Hall et al, 2018; Khayum & Wynn, 2015; Regan et al, 2019; Rodakowski, Reynolds, et al, 2018) of which two described case studies (Khayum & Wynn, 2015; Rodakowski, Reynolds, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining studies were predominantly pre‐post evaluations, or observational studies. Nine studies used mixed methods evaluation methods (Allan et al, 2019; Berwig et al, 2020; Chenoweth et al, 2016; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, Morgan‐Trimmer, et al, 2019; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, & Woods, 2019; Jennings et al, 2018; Lu et al, 2016; Øksnebjerg et al, 2019; O'Sullivan et al, 2015), and four studies used qualitative methods (Hall et al, 2018; Khayum & Wynn, 2015; Regan et al, 2019; Rodakowski, Reynolds, et al, 2018) of which two described case studies (Khayum & Wynn, 2015; Rodakowski, Reynolds, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, three (Allan et al, 2019; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, Morgan‐Trimmer, et al, 2019; Clare, Kudlicka, Oyebode, Jones, Bayer, Leroi, Kopelman, James, Culverwell, Pool, Brand, Henderson, Hoare, Knapp, & Woods, 2019) showed highest level of methodological quality (each scoring 100% for quality on the MMAT) by describing and synthesising all detail and findings from the qualitative and quantitative components in a manner that added value of conducting a mixed methods study. Of the qualitative studies ( n = 4), two (Hall et al, 2018; Regan et al, 2019) provided comprehensive detail of the study methods. The data collection methods and data synthesis were described in lesser detail in the study by Khayum and Wynn (2015) and also difficult to ascertain from the case study by Rodakowski, Reynolds, et al (2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations