Most novel vaccines against infectious diseases are based on recombinant Ag; however, only few studies have compared Ag-specific immune responses induced by natural infection with that induced by the same Ag in a recombinant form. Here, we studied the epitope recognition pattern of the tuberculosis vaccine Ag, TB10.4, in a recombinant form, or when expressed by the pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), or by the current anti-tuberculosis vaccine, Mycobacterium bovis BCG. We showed that BCG and M.tb induced a similar CD4 1 T-cell specific TB10.4 epitope-pattern, which differed completely from that induced by recombinant TB10.4. This difference was not due to post-translational modifications of TB10.4 or because TB10.4 is secreted from BCG and M.tb as a complex with Rv0287. In addition, BCG and TB10.4/CAF01 were both taken up by DC and macrophages in vivo, and in vitro uptake experiments revealed that both TB10.4 and BCG were transported to Lamp 1 -compartments. BCG and TB10.4 however, were directed to different types of Lamp 1 -compartments in the same APC, which may lead to different epitope recognition patterns. In conclusion, we show that different vectors can induce completely different recognition of the same protein.Key words: Epitopes . Intracellular localization . Subdominant . T cells . Vaccine uptake
IntroductionThe size, shape and nature of a synthetic recombinant vaccine and its target pathogen differ significantly. For instance, bacteria are typically in the range of 0.5-10 mm in diameter, which exceed the size of most viruses by 10 to 100-fold, and protein based adjuvanted vaccines are even smaller. In addition, compared with vaccines based on recombinant proteins and an adjuvant, pathogens are often taken up by different mechanisms by the cells of the immune system [1]. The different uptake mechanisms could lead to different intracellular processing of Ag, giving rise to different epitopes [1]. Furthermore, live pathogens express a wide range of specific lipids
1342and proteins that bind a variety of pattern-recognition receptors on phagocytes and induce signaling through these receptors, whereas recent evidence suggests subunit vaccines more specifically tend to target DC through activation of toll-like receptors [2]. These differences are likely to lead to different responses with regard to the priming of the early immune response [3]. For instance, the main host cell of the intracellular pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), the causative agent of tuberculosis in humans, is thought to be macrophages [4]; however, although mycobacteria are mainly taken up by macrophages, mycobacteria can infect a wide range of cells including neutrophils, epithelial cells and other cell types [5,6]. On the other hand, viral vaccine vectors have been shown to be ingested largely by immature DC [1], and soluble Ag formulated in cationic adjuvants such as CAF01 or IC31 are also believed to target DC [7,8]. Different types of APC have different mechanisms of Ag uptake, different pH levels in lysosomal co...