Pursuant to our commentaries concerning lymphomas and Mycoplasma pulmonis in bioassays of aspartame, methanol, and methyl tert-butyl ether in rats, 15,16 we direct interested readers to a partial review of the methanol study 17 in which 3 National Toxicology Program (NTP) pathologists examined selected slides from 100 male rats in each of 0 ppm and 20,000 ppm dose groups. The review team's report 9 states, ''The histopathologic diagnoses by the NTP pathologists for a number of lesions . . . differed from those of the [study pathologist].'' The NTP pathologists ''occasionally diagnosed 'leukemia' or 'lymphoma' of the lung, but at a lower frequency than the original findings,'' and diagnosed leukemia or lymphoma less frequently in lymph nodes. This report led to the unprecedented and commendable action by the US Environmental Protection Agency to hold ''four of its ongoing Integrated Risk Information System assessments pending a review,'' including those of methanol and methyl tert-butyl ether, and to undertake ''a thorough review of all ongoing and previous chemical assessments to determine which, if any, relied substantially on cancer testing'' by the laboratory that conducted these bioassays. 3 The NTP team's report does not include specific findings that would allow assessment of the possibility that results of a full audit and pathology peer review would alter the conclusion that methanol induced lymphoma, 17 stating that the ''findings are preliminary and intended as a basis for recommendations and are not intended to reach conclusions about any possible or reported effect of the chemical under study.'' 9 We consider it in the public interest to promote resolution of the scientific questions that have been raised about the methanol and other bioassays. 2,4,[6][7][8][10][11][12][13]15,16 We therefore obtained the results of the slide review from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences via a Freedom of Information Act request and analyzed them for differences between the NTP pathologists' diagnoses and those of the study pathologist. We tabulated diagnoses of lymphoma, leukemia, and histiocytic sarcoma in thymus, lung, liver, spleen, and lymph nodes and inflammatory lesions in the nose, lung, and ear. Diagnoses of lymphoma or leukemia were considered to agree without regard to further classification; thus, diagnoses of lymphoimmunoblastic lymphoma and malignant lymphoma were considered to agree, Veterinary Pathology 48(4) 903-905