2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21969.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-body models of globular clusters: metallicities, half-light radii and mass-to-light ratios

Abstract: Size differences of ≈20 per cent between red (metal‐rich) and blue (metal‐poor) subpopulations of globular clusters have been observed, generating an ongoing debate as to whether these originate from projection effects or the difference in metallicity. We present direct N‐body simulations of metal‐rich and metal‐poor stellar populations evolved to study the effects of metallicity on cluster evolution. The models start with N = 100 000 stars and include primordial binaries. We also take metallicity‐dependent st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, at a fixed age of 11 Gyr, metal rich clusters have on average higher M/L, because of a decrease in luminosity due to higher stellar opacity (e.g. Sippel et al 2012), as expected from stellar population models. In panel C and D of Fig.…”
Section: Global Relationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, at a fixed age of 11 Gyr, metal rich clusters have on average higher M/L, because of a decrease in luminosity due to higher stellar opacity (e.g. Sippel et al 2012), as expected from stellar population models. In panel C and D of Fig.…”
Section: Global Relationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A signature of a dependence of the relaxation time on the metallicity of the clusters is present in the data of Strader et al (2011), where GCs with higher metallicity show a lower relaxation time, on average. However, we should be cautious about this trend due to possible observational effects biasing the measurements of the half-light radii (and therefore of the relaxation times) of metal rich clusters (i.e., the combined effect of stellar evolution and mass segregation can bias the cluster size measurements, giving lower values for the halflight radii for metal rich clusters; see for example Sippel et al 2012;Shanahan & Gieles 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading explanations of why this size difference exists suggest that red and blue clusters have different formation, dynamical and stellar evolution histories (e.g. Kundu & Whitmore 1998;Jordán 2004;Jordán et al 2005;Harris 2009a;Sippel et al 2012;Schulman et al 2012). Here we explore the possibility that the size difference may be due to different orbital anisotropy profiles.…”
Section: Red and Blue Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also rather "simple" stellar systems consisting of a distinct population, which is in dynamic equilibrium. Therefore, they are used for extensive N-body simulation in order to understand the formation and evolution of the Milky Way (Sippel et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%