2004
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200400244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N‐Tetrachlorophthaloyl (TCP) Protection for Solid‐Phase Peptide Synthesis

Abstract: The N‐tetrachlorophthaloyl‐(TCP‐)amino protecting group has been evaluated for use in solid‐phase peptide synthesis. The TCP group was unaffected by exposure to either piperidine or N,N‐diisopropylethylamine (DIEA), which suggests compatibility with both Fmoc and Boc solid‐phase synthesis protocols. Quantitative TCP removal was achieved by treatment with hydrazine/DMF (3:17) at 35 °C for 30 min or with ethylenediamine/DMF (1:200) at 50 °C for 30 min. Several C‐terminal peptide amides were synthesized successfu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of TCP with EDA partially deprotected the Fmoc group as well, which is not an issue if both groups are detached at the final step from the solid support. However, and in contrast to literature, [20,22] in our hands the TCP functionality turned out to be unstable towards nucleophilic amines, such as piperidine or morpholine used during Fmoc and Alloc groups removal. Based on HPLC-MS results, the side product structure was proposed to derive from the nucleophilic attack of such amines to the phthalimide moiety (see ESI, Section 4d, Scheme S1).…”
Section: Compatibility Among the Different Functionalities And Reaction Conditionscontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Removal of TCP with EDA partially deprotected the Fmoc group as well, which is not an issue if both groups are detached at the final step from the solid support. However, and in contrast to literature, [20,22] in our hands the TCP functionality turned out to be unstable towards nucleophilic amines, such as piperidine or morpholine used during Fmoc and Alloc groups removal. Based on HPLC-MS results, the side product structure was proposed to derive from the nucleophilic attack of such amines to the phthalimide moiety (see ESI, Section 4d, Scheme S1).…”
Section: Compatibility Among the Different Functionalities And Reaction Conditionscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Interestingly, the use of hydrazine (H2NNH2•H2O) for TCP deprotection was not suitable as both click groups were affected, mainly by reduction (see ESI, Section 4c). [20] During Alloc deprotection using Pd(0), the TCO group remained untouched when nucleophilic scavengers such as morpholine or dimethyl barbituric acid (DBA) were present, while other scavengers (SiHPr3, Me2N•BH3) led to decomposition of the click group (reduction was observed, among other side reactions). [21] On the other hand, the BCN group was not stable toward Pd(0) (partial reduction), regardless of the nature of the scavenger.…”
Section: Compatibility Among the Different Functionalities And Reaction Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this cyclization has been used as the basis for the development of a mild protocol for preparation of phthalimides. Tetrachlorophthaloyl group is an improved analog of Phth and can be removed under mild conditions by treatment with 15% hydrazine in N,N 0 -dimethylformamide (DMF) for 1 h at room temperature [13].…”
Section: Monoacyl Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If utilized, the most popular deprotection conditions involve hydrazine. 18 On the other hand, ethylene diamine is one attractive alternative due to its less harsh nature, increased reactivity, and overall safer use. 19 Procedures describing this method typically employ an excess of ethylene diamine in butanol or isopropanol at reflux.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%