2008
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2008.11101423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nosema apis infection in honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Hungary, differentiation between N. ceranae and N. apis spores by PCR analysis reported a low incidence of N. apis in Hungarian apiaries (26). Webster et al (27) noted that PCR analysis was more sensitive than examination for spores by light microscopy in detecting N. apis infection. Different researchers who used the same technique determined N. ceranae for the first time in European honeybee colonies in Canada and the central USA (28), France (20), Spain (29), Jordan (30), and the United States (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hungary, differentiation between N. ceranae and N. apis spores by PCR analysis reported a low incidence of N. apis in Hungarian apiaries (26). Webster et al (27) noted that PCR analysis was more sensitive than examination for spores by light microscopy in detecting N. apis infection. Different researchers who used the same technique determined N. ceranae for the first time in European honeybee colonies in Canada and the central USA (28), France (20), Spain (29), Jordan (30), and the United States (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emerging gut parasite, Nosema ceranae, and the more familiar N. apis, are of particular interest because studies have shown that these microsporidians can be transferred to the queen via trophallaxis of contaminated food during shipment in queen mailing cages (Webster et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2008). The absence of N. apis and N. ceranae, as well as the tracheal mite Acarapis woodi, among the sampled queens in the current study is encouraging, particularly in light of previous studies showing very high infection rates (Furgala, 1962;Jay and Dixon, 1984;Camazine et al, 1998), and it suggests that commercial queen producers utilize effective management practices regarding the prevention and spread of these parasites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While honey bees are hosts to a wide variety of parasites and pathogens (Schmid-Hempel, 1998), only a subset tend to infect queen bees. The more notable parasites of queens are tracheal mites Acarapis woodi (Burgett and Kitprasert, 1992;Camazine et al, 1998;Villa and Danka, 2005), the gut protozoan Nosema apis (Webster et al, 2004(Webster et al, , 2008 and, presumably, N. ceranae (Higes et al, 2006(Higes et al, , 2008. Moreover, queens may be infected with numerous viruses (Chen et al, 2005;Yang and Cox-Foster, 2005), including acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), black queen cell virus (BQCV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), sacbrood virus (SBV), and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with workers, a range of different doses have been used to study effects of infection on queens individually fed, although again, more spores were provided than were required (Alaux et al 2010c;Webster, 2008). Using individual feeding, queens and worker bees have become infected using similar spore doses (Webster et al, 2004), but the infectious doses for queens have never been established for either of the two microsporidian infections discussed.…”
Section: Study Of Dose Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%