2015
DOI: 10.1112/plms/pdv058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OEandW* superrigidity results for actions by surface braid groups

Abstract: A. We show that several important normal subgroups Γ of the mapping class group of a surface satisfy the following property: any free, ergodic, probability measure preserving action Γ X is stably OE-superrigid. These include the central quotients of most surface braid groups and most Torelli groups and Johnson kernels. In addition, we show that all these groups satisfy the measure equivalence rigidity and we describe all their lattice-embeddings.Using these results in combination with previous results from [CI… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.9]). Recently, some other examples of taut groups have arisen in the literature [CK15], [Bow17], and some other rigidity results have been obtained [Aus16], [Can17], [GL18], [Savb].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.9]). Recently, some other examples of taut groups have arisen in the literature [CK15], [Bow17], and some other rigidity results have been obtained [Aus16], [Can17], [GL18], [Savb].…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one can let G be a direct product of mapping class groups: indeed, direct products of properly proximal groups are again properly proximal [BIP18, Proposition 4.10], and the orbit equivalence rigidity result from [Kid08] still holds for products of mapping class groups. Also, Chifan and Kida showed in [CK15] that many interesting subgroups of the mapping class groups which act nonelementarily on the curve graph -such as the Torelli subgroup -are rigid for measure equivalence, and therefore their ergodic actions are rigid for orbit equivalence. Such groups are properly proximal by Theorem 3.9, so an analogue of Theorem 4.3 also holds for these groups.…”
Section: C-rigidity Of Cat(0) Cubical Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[M : A 1 ∨ A 2 ] < ∞ and hence by [CK15,Proposition 8.5] we have L(Λ) ≺ M L(π −1 (Γ i )). This gives [Λ : π −1 (Γ i )] < ∞ which in turn implies [Γ : Γ i ] < ∞ which can hold only if Γ i = Σ, a contradiction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%