2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c11156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operando Optical Analysis of LiFePO4 Composite Electrodes

Abstract: Elucidating reaction inhomogeneity of composite electrodes is key to improve the performances of batteries such as rate capability and durability. Because the reaction inhomogeneity often disappears after a certain relaxation period, operando analytical techniques are indispensable. We hereby propose that operando optical analysis as a common lab method can be applied to visualize the reaction inhomogeneity of LiFePO 4 composite electrodes for lithium-ion batteries with sufficient space and time resolutions. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some light may also escape through refraction or scattering events at the interface between the fiber core and the surrounding medium due to surface defects and irregularities of the optical fibers if conditions of TIR are not fully met . A trend of slightly higher optical response from LiFePO 4 composite electrodes toward shorter wavelengths during charge and discharge was also observed by Arai et al who showed that the charged phase, FePO 4 , shows higher brightness compared to the lithiated LiFePO 4 using an electrochemical window cell and a confocal optical system . The measured reflectivity of LFP during charge and discharge was converted to intensities of red, green and blue color where blue light with representative wavelengths of 470 ± 30 nm showed a higher output signal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some light may also escape through refraction or scattering events at the interface between the fiber core and the surrounding medium due to surface defects and irregularities of the optical fibers if conditions of TIR are not fully met . A trend of slightly higher optical response from LiFePO 4 composite electrodes toward shorter wavelengths during charge and discharge was also observed by Arai et al who showed that the charged phase, FePO 4 , shows higher brightness compared to the lithiated LiFePO 4 using an electrochemical window cell and a confocal optical system . The measured reflectivity of LFP during charge and discharge was converted to intensities of red, green and blue color where blue light with representative wavelengths of 470 ± 30 nm showed a higher output signal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…26 A trend of slightly higher optical response from LiFePO 4 composite electrodes toward shorter wavelengths during charge and discharge was also observed by Arai et al who showed that the charged phase, FePO 4 , shows higher brightness compared to the lithiated LiFePO 4 using an electrochemical window cell and a confocal optical system. 27 The measured reflectivity of LFP during charge and discharge was converted to intensities of red, green and blue color where blue light with representative wavelengths of 470 ± 30 nm showed a higher output signal. The authors also presented, based on theoretically obtained refractive index and extinction coefficient of LiFePO 4 and FePO 4 , that the calculated reflectivity was higher for the delithiated phase compared to LiFePO 4 , especially at lower wavelengths in the range of 400−500 nm, which is in line with our observations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 This behavior has been supported also by the optical measurements. 18 Phase transitions are reported to be the ratedetermining factor in some other biphasic systems. 19 One of the common methods to evaluate the phase transition kinetics is chronoamperometry by the potential step measurement where the current response, associated with the fraction of the phase transition product, is measured as a function of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key difference between WF and LSCRM is that in the latter, specified depths of a material can be individually probed (sectioning). Over the last decade optical reflection microscopies, predominantly with WF or single plane illumination, have emerged as in-expensive tool for also tracking battery electrode dynamics [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . This is because the reflectivity of many micron sized features on the electrode surface can dramatically increase, decrease or spectrally shift on (de)lithiation 22,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%