2004 IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2004.1414972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I-P controller design for quadruple-tank system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective control of this system has been one of the major challenges for the researchers in the field of control systems. Several control methods have been introduced and tested on this system, among which we find: Decentralized Proportional Integral (PI) Control [13][14][15], Feedback Relay Auto-Tuning PID Control [16], Linear Quadratic Optimal Control [17], Nonlinear Model Predictive Control [18], Model Predictive Control Based on Quadratic Cost Function [19], Neural Model Predictive Control [20], Quantitative Feedback Method [21].…”
Section: A Plant Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective control of this system has been one of the major challenges for the researchers in the field of control systems. Several control methods have been introduced and tested on this system, among which we find: Decentralized Proportional Integral (PI) Control [13][14][15], Feedback Relay Auto-Tuning PID Control [16], Linear Quadratic Optimal Control [17], Nonlinear Model Predictive Control [18], Model Predictive Control Based on Quadratic Cost Function [19], Neural Model Predictive Control [20], Quantitative Feedback Method [21].…”
Section: A Plant Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of this system has also yielded plenty of conference and journal papers. A number of these reports, for instance (Alavi and Hayes, 2006;Alavi et al, 2005;Gatzke et al, 2002;Johansson, 2000;Johansson et al, 1999;Johansson and Nunes, 1998;Numsomran et al, 2004;Rusli et al, 2002) are, however, based on erroneous mathematical modelling and thus resulting incorrect results. Obviously all these reports refer to the one and same paper (Johansson, 2000) which includes this incorrect part of modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%