2010
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P‐value based analysis for shared controls design in genome‐wide association studies

Abstract: An appealing genome-wide association study design compares one large control group against several disease samples. A pioneering study by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium that employed such a design has identified multiple susceptibility regions, many of which have been independently replicated. While reusing a control sample provides effective utilization of data, it also creates correlation between association statistics across diseases. An observation of a large association statistic for one of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no evidence of genomic inflation. To identify shared pAID-association loci, we performed an inverse χ 2 meta-analysis, accounting for sample-size variation and the use of a shared control across the ten pAIDs 25 . We identified 27 linkage disequilibrium (LD)-independent loci, consisting of associated SNPs with r 2 > 0.05 within a 1-Mb window where at least one lead SNP reached a conventionally defined GWS threshold ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no evidence of genomic inflation. To identify shared pAID-association loci, we performed an inverse χ 2 meta-analysis, accounting for sample-size variation and the use of a shared control across the ten pAIDs 25 . We identified 27 linkage disequilibrium (LD)-independent loci, consisting of associated SNPs with r 2 > 0.05 within a 1-Mb window where at least one lead SNP reached a conventionally defined GWS threshold ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adjust for confounding due to the use of a shared or pooled control population, we applied a previously published method to perform an inverse weighted χ 2 meta-analysis 80 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we used the method of Zaykin and Kozbur 21 , which is similar to the method by Lin and Sullivan 22 to account for overlap of an estimated ~38,000 controls between the CARDIoGRAM and METASTROKE samples from the KORA, WTCCC2, CHARGE and deCODE studies (the exact number of overlapping controls could not be determined in the absence of individualized data) which may lead to the inflation of meta-analysis p-values. This program compensates for this lack of independence in test statistics created by the use of the same controls by computing the correlation between studies and using this measure for correction of p-values obtained from a standard meta-analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a common assumption in a meta-analysis is the independence of samples in the studies to be combined. If this assumption is violated, for example, because of overlap of a subset of individuals across studies, this may result in spurious associations (Lin and Sullivan, 2009;Zaykin and Kozbur, 2010). Similarly, in a comparative study, differences in sample size between data sets can have an adverse effect in an intersection analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%