Per Diem Payments as a form of Censorship and Control: The Case of Guinea-Bissau’s Journalism

Abstract

This article discusses the habit of politicians paying journalists per diem rates in exchange for media coverage. Although bribery and money incentives have been studied as practices that compromise the ethics of journalism in several African countries, this paper researches Guinea-Bissau as an example and establishes a distinction. Unlike bribery, the widespread payment of these stipends is legal, but it is chronically damaging for freedom of expression and professional integrity. Drawing on interviews, focus groups and ethnographic observation with professionals from national, local and community media, this paper documents the precarious state of journalism in Guinea-Bissau, particularly the sector's acute lack of financial resources and meagre wages. News sources, and dominantly the government and parties, organise multiple events, attracting coverage in exchange for remuneration. Accepting these payments is, for many journalists, the only possible mode of subsisting, despite compromising their independence. News coverage is consequently saturated with propaganda, and forms of investigative journalism are rare. This article argues that the payment of per diem rates, accepted as legitimate and common practice in several other countries, has led to a pervasive control of journalism.

News Media Logic and Democracy: Strange Bedfellows in Political News-making Practices of Private Radio Stations in Ghana

“…A major theme that emerged from the interviews, and which has received much scholarly attention in African journalism is brown envelop phenomenon or incentive-driven coverage (Skjerdal 2010;Sampaio-Dias 2019). The practice has become so pervasive in media culture that most journalists in the interviews talked about it matter-of-factly as shown in this senior editor's comment:…”

Decolonising Political Communication in Africa

“…Payment can be in the form of cash or in kind. The practice is quite endemic among media organisations in most of Africa (Amankwah et al, 2017;Osei-Appiah, 2019;Sampaio-Dias, 2019;Skjerdal, 2018). The challenge with incentive-driven coverage is that it creates a media culture that undermines the ideals of journalism in that it facilitates biased reporting while constraining diversity in media content (Sampaio-Dias, 2019).…”

“…The practice is quite endemic among media organisations in most of Africa (Amankwah et al, 2017;Osei-Appiah, 2019;Sampaio-Dias, 2019;Skjerdal, 2018). The challenge with incentive-driven coverage is that it creates a media culture that undermines the ideals of journalism in that it facilitates biased reporting while constraining diversity in media content (Sampaio-Dias, 2019). In particular, it is exclusionary as it prevents many women politicians from being seen and heard in the media space because they are unable to pay for coverage (Osei-Appiah, 2019).…”

Practices, Policies and Regulation in African Journalism: Mapping a Research Agenda

“…This exclusion is a detriment to democracy, as they provide audiences with a limited reality of the political space. Furthermore, this research explores a long-lasting academic discussion about monetary incentive-driven political coverage in African journalism (see, for example, Skjerdal 2010Skjerdal , 2018Osman 2017;Sampaio-Dias 2019), as interviewees explained that the inability to pay for coverage resulted in political invisibility in the media.…”

“…More recently, we have seen the emergence of different trends in media regulation models such as the self-regulation of media sectors. This has become particularly popular in fragile contexts where governmental structures and mechanisms for media regulation are weak or nonexistent (Sampaio-Dias 2019). In this sense, the efforts for media self-regulation in the absence of proper regulation or accountability stem from the need to act, rather than the proven effectiveness of the model (Daubert in De la Brosse and Frère 2012).…”