2005
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.268.14.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Period3 Structural Variation: A Circadian Biomarker Associated with Breast Cancer in Young Women

Abstract: Circadian disruption has been indicated as a risk factor for breast cancer in recent epidemiologic studies. A novel finding in circadian biology is that genes responsible for circadian rhythm also regulate many other biological pathways, including cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis. Therefore, mutations in circadian genes could conceivably result in deregulation of these processes and contribute to tumor development, and be markers for susceptibility to human cancer. In this study, we inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies support a carcinogenic effect of light exposure at night (Yang et al, 2014), whereas others do not (Dun et al, 2020). Some studies in humans have also found an association between the risk of breast cancer and either the homozygous or heterozygous 5-repeat allele of PER3 (Zhu et al, 2005) or the Ala394Thr polymorphism of the NPAS2 gene (Zhu et al, 2008). However, other analyses which found marginal associations between polymorphisms of ARNTL and CRY1 and breast cancer revealed insignificant results after statistically adjusting for multiple comparisons (Grundy et al, 2013).…”
Section: Physical Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies support a carcinogenic effect of light exposure at night (Yang et al, 2014), whereas others do not (Dun et al, 2020). Some studies in humans have also found an association between the risk of breast cancer and either the homozygous or heterozygous 5-repeat allele of PER3 (Zhu et al, 2005) or the Ala394Thr polymorphism of the NPAS2 gene (Zhu et al, 2008). However, other analyses which found marginal associations between polymorphisms of ARNTL and CRY1 and breast cancer revealed insignificant results after statistically adjusting for multiple comparisons (Grundy et al, 2013).…”
Section: Physical Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human clock gene PER3, located on chromosome 1p36.23, contains a polymorphic domain expressing 4 or 5 copies of a 54-bp tandem repeat sequence (variable number tandem repeat, VNTR) (Zhu et al, 2005). Variation in this sequence has been associated with circadian preference and sleep and mood disorders (Archer et al, 2003(Archer et al, , 2010Ebisawa et al, 2001;Nievergelt et al, 2006;Viola et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Immuneering Corp, Cambridge, MA, USA. 8 Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 9 Bionano Genomics, San Diego CA92121, USA.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of all somatic variants that can be cancer driver events, SVs can be the most challenging to detect using NGS due to the repetitive structure of the human genome [5,6]. Current clinical testing utilizes G-band karyotyping, PCR, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), all of which are low-throughput technologies that require prior knowledge of the SV's genomic location [7][8][9]. The advent of microarrays has increased throughput, but microarrays lack the base pair resolution to pinpoint the precise start and stop locations of rearrangements [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%