2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planck2013 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties

Abstract: We present the current estimate of instrumental and systematic effect uncertainties for the Planck-Low Frequency Instrument relevant to the first release of the Planck cosmological results. We give an overview of the main effects and of the tools and methods applied to assess residuals in maps and power spectra. We also present an overall budget of known systematic effect uncertainties, which are dominated by sidelobe straylight pick-up and imperfect calibration. However, even these two effects are at least tw… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the shape of the reconstructed form of the PPS might prove to be a guide toward the identification of some systematics in the pipelines of the data reduction and analysis of Planck CMB data as well. While the discrepancies can result from various systematics in weak lensing surveys [14] or Planck CMB data [15,16], we also point to the consideration of the baryonic feedback in weak lensing analysis that has been suggested in literature to help reducing the tensions [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Nevertheless, the shape of the reconstructed form of the PPS might prove to be a guide toward the identification of some systematics in the pipelines of the data reduction and analysis of Planck CMB data as well. While the discrepancies can result from various systematics in weak lensing surveys [14] or Planck CMB data [15,16], we also point to the consideration of the baryonic feedback in weak lensing analysis that has been suggested in literature to help reducing the tensions [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In general we want this uncertainty to be much less than that imposed by the white noise. Following the approach already adopted for Planck-LFI [100,101] we set this limit to 5% of the white noise level as a goal and 10% of the white noise level as a requirement. In table 5 we provide a list of systematic effects that could affect Strip polarimetric measurements and goal/requirement values for the upper limit in the systematic uncertainty.…”
Section: Lspe-strip Systematic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the way in which systematic effects impact the science products of the mission is far from trivial (e.g. [62]). In general it is necessary to simulate systematic effects and propagate them through the data analysis pipeline up to the cosmological results, with an accuracy and a level of detail that depends on the significance of the specific effect being evaluated.…”
Section: Instrument Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%