1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1994.tb03931.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PnVelocities Beneath Continental Collision Zones: the Turkish-Iranian Plateau

Abstract: SUMMARY Tomographic imaging of the uppermost mantle velocity in the Middle East shows normal Pn velocities (8.0–8.2 km s−1) beneath the Black Sea and the southern Caspian Sea. In contrast, low Pn velocities (<7.9 km s−1) are found beneath the Aegean Sea and much of the Turkish‐Iranian Plateau. A region of exceptionally low Pn velocities (<7.6 km s−1) beneath the Lesser Caucasus Mountains and along the Turkish‐Iranian border coincides with a region of high Sn attenuation and extensive Neogene volcanism. All the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
156
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
156
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These low-velocity anomalies are associated with volcanic activity, i.e., the Tengchong volcano, and is likely a result of the higher temperatures and/or partial melting associated with volcanism (Hearn and Ni, 1994). Low P n velocity anomalies are also associated with the subduction in the Hindu Kush region as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These low-velocity anomalies are associated with volcanic activity, i.e., the Tengchong volcano, and is likely a result of the higher temperatures and/or partial melting associated with volcanism (Hearn and Ni, 1994). Low P n velocity anomalies are also associated with the subduction in the Hindu Kush region as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Hearn's approach and computation method (Hearn and Ni, 1994;Hearn, 1996), we invert travel-time difference residuals between Pn and Sn for lateral velocity variation of the pseudowave within the mantle lid. Equation (3) can be recast as Ax d, where d is the data vector, x is the vector of unknowns, and A represents the model parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] Checkerboard tests are commonly used to assess model resolution in tomographic studies [e.g., Hearn and Ni, 1994;Zelt and Barton, 1998]. Although the details of individual tests may vary, they all follow similar principles.…”
Section: Traveltime Fitting and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%