2020
DOI: 10.1075/rcl.00057.du
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(‘break’),qiē(‘cut’) andkāi(‘open’) in Chinese

Abstract: This study explores the conceptual boundaries among break, cut and open from an under-investigated diachronic perspective and addresses the diachronic conceptual variations of Chinese pò (‘break’), qiē (‘cut’) and kāi (‘open’). The Center for Chinese Linguistics corpus is employed for the extraction of historical data. Correspondence analyses are conducted for uncovering the conceptual boundary variations among pò qiē, and kāi. In doing so, this study, situated in Diachronic Prototype Semantics, has revealed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a huge amount of literature concerning single-language and crosslinguistic studies on motion typology (Aske, 1989;Ji & Hohenstein, 2014a, 2014b, 2018Naidu et al, 2018;Slobin, 1996;Zlatev & Yangklang, 2004; among others), but only a few studies center on state change and realization (Du et al, 2020;Kou & Hohenstein, 2020, 2021Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1991). It is worth noting that there has been relatively little investigation into the full range of macro-event.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge amount of literature concerning single-language and crosslinguistic studies on motion typology (Aske, 1989;Ji & Hohenstein, 2014a, 2014b, 2018Naidu et al, 2018;Slobin, 1996;Zlatev & Yangklang, 2004; among others), but only a few studies center on state change and realization (Du et al, 2020;Kou & Hohenstein, 2020, 2021Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1991). It is worth noting that there has been relatively little investigation into the full range of macro-event.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%