2020
DOI: 10.1111/psq.12642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polls and Elections: The Skeptical Faithful: How Trump Gained Momentum among Evangelicals

Abstract: This article examines the origins of the unlikely alliance between Donald Trump and evangelicals, a relationship that defines the modern-day Republican Party. Using 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study data, I explain how Trump ultimately succeeded among this critical group of Republican primary voters in the contest for the 2016 presidential nomination by exploiting key internal divisions. Trump initially performed well among less educated evangelicals who were less devoted to their religion and less… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evangelicals chose to support Trump. Similar to Scala's (2020) and Myers (2019) findings, Monk-Turner (2019) claimed that evangelical support for Donald Trump was shaped by their stance on gender culture war issues. Abortion played a huge role in evangelical support for Trump.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The evangelicals chose to support Trump. Similar to Scala's (2020) and Myers (2019) findings, Monk-Turner (2019) claimed that evangelical support for Donald Trump was shaped by their stance on gender culture war issues. Abortion played a huge role in evangelical support for Trump.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Reed examined how Danforth's political centrism and moral political leadership were shaped by his Anglican faith. Some scholars have started to recognize the unique challenge a Trump candidacy and presidency poses for evangelical Christians (e.g., Margolis, 2019;Marti, 2019;Miller, 2019;Myers, 2019;Scala, 2020). For example, Margolis (2019) claimed that nominal evangelicals (evangelicals who only casually identify with their religion) supported Trump more than passionately engaged evangelicals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6.Scala's (2020) recent analysis of voter behavior of the 2016 Republican Presidential primaries lends some weight to this possibility, finding that evangelicals who were less devoted to their religion were more supportive of Trump than highly devout evangelicals (who, in theory, should be the most receptive to covert cues) in the early stages of the primary.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scala's (2020) recent analysis of voter behavior the 2016 Republican Presidential primaries lends some weight to this possibility, finding that Evangelicals who were less devoted to their religion were more supportive of Trump than highly devout Evangelicals (who, in theory, should be the most receptive to covert cues) in the early stages of the primary.6 Though, it is important to note that these incidents require satisfaction of the ignorability assumption.Moreover, even if religious adherents are aware of such scandals, their reactions are also likely conditioned by negative partisanship(Margolis 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%