<i>Qui s'excuse s'accuse</i>… An Analysis of French Justifications for Intervening in Côte d'Ivoire

Simonen, Katariina

doi:10.1080/13533312.2012.696387

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also included three nonneighboring countries of origin. France is the former colonizer and continues to have strong-and often controversial-influence in Côte d'Ivoire (Simonen 2012). Lebanon was included because there is a small, yet economically important, Lebanese community in Côte d'Ivoire dating back to the 1920s.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Which Immigrants Should Be Naturalized? Which Should Be Deported? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Côte d’Ivoire

Cogley

Doces

Whitaker

2018

Political Research Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experimental studies on immigration attitudes have been conducted overwhelmingly in Western countries and have focused on immigrant admission and naturalization, neglecting deportation as a possible outcome. In a survey experiment in Côte d’Ivoire, where immigrants represent more than one-tenth of the population, we randomized attributes of hypothetical immigrants to determine which factors influenced respondents’ support for naturalization or deportation compared with staying in the country without citizenship. Support for naturalization was shaped by several expected economic and social attributes, while deportation preferences were influenced primarily by the immigrant’s legal status and level of savings. Cultural proximity produced mixed results, with respondents less likely to support the naturalization of immigrants from neighboring African countries but also less likely to deport immigrants with whom they shared a religious faith. Finally, respondents were more likely to support the naturalization of immigrants who planned to vote if granted citizenship, especially when they were of the same religion as the respondent, indicating a degree of electoral calculation in a context where voting patterns are associated with religious identities. Together, these findings suggest that citizen preferences for naturalization and deportation are influenced by somewhat different factors, a possibility that warrants further testing in other contexts.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Which Immigrants Should Be Naturalized? Which Should Be Deported? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Côte d’Ivoire

Cogley

Doces

Whitaker

2018

Political Research Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For four months, tensions between the two camps degenerated into armed fighting between the national Security and Defence Forces (FDS) loyal to Laurent Gbagbo and the Republican Forces of Côte d'Ivoire (FRCI), composed of former 'Forces Nouvelles' rebels, 3 who supported his rival Alassane Ouattara (Zounmenou and Lamin, 2011). The arrest of Laurent Gbagbo and his wife Simone Gbagbo in April 2011, by pro-Ouattara forces that were con-troversially assisted by UN peacekeepers and French forces (Yebouet, 2011), marked the end of the conflict (Simonen, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge asymmetry and transitional justice in Cte dIvoire1

N’Da¹,

Fokou²

2021

Knowledge for Peace

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, due to the limited space available in this article, the discussion in this article is limited to China and Russia as they are often the ones that are said to be forming an anti-Western opposition bloc in the UNSC against Western-led calls for the use of the R2P doctrine. For more information on the position of France vis-à-vis R2P, see Bellamy and Williams (2011), Davidson (2013), andSimonen (2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

'The Loud Dissenter and its Cautious Partner' - Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention

Snetkov¹,

Lanteigne²

2014

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global issue of humanitarian intervention has become more pronounced and complicated in recent years due to increasingly diverging views on addressing security crises between the West on one side and Russia and China on the other. Despite their support for the principles of 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P), both Russia and China are wary of Western intervention in internal conflicts after the Cold War and have become increasingly critical of Western-led armed intervention in humanitarian conflicts. Unease in Beijing and Moscow over the multilateral intervention in the 2011 Libyan conflict and their ongoing opposition to Western policies in the Syrian Civil War since 2011 would seem to point to ever more coincidence in their negative views of American and Western intervention policies. A conventional wisdom has thus emerged that there is something akin to a Sino-Russian 'bloc', with near-identical policies of discouraging armed intervention within state borders under the aegis of humanitarian intervention or the R2P doctrine, signed in 2005

show abstract

Qui s'excuse s'accuse… An Analysis of French Justifications for Intervening in Côte d'Ivoire

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Which Immigrants Should Be Naturalized? Which Should Be Deported? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Côte d’Ivoire

Which Immigrants Should Be Naturalized? Which Should Be Deported? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Côte d’Ivoire

Knowledge asymmetry and transitional justice in Cte dIvoire1

'The Loud Dissenter and its Cautious Partner' - Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About