2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R-matrix electron-impact excitation data for astrophysically abundant sulphur ions

Abstract: We present results for the electron-impact excitation of highly-charged sulphur ions (S 8+ -S 11+ ) obtained using the intermediatecoupling frame transformation R-matrix approach. A detailed comparison of the target structure has been made for the four ions to assess the uncertainty on collision strengths from the target structure. Effective collision strengths (Υs) are presented at temperatures ranging from 2 × 10 2 (z + 1) 2 K to 2 × 10 6 (z + 1) 2 K (where z is the residual charge of ions). Detailed compari… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of energy levels of the target ion and the temperature range of the effective collision strength vary significantly. For instance, Tayal (2007) provided effective collision strengths for O ii between 47 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 3.3−5 K. Ramsbottom & Bell (1997) obtained effective collision strengths for Mg vi between 23 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 5.0−6.1 K. Liang et al (2011) provided effective collision strengths for S x between 84 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 4.3−8.3 K. Witthoeft et al (2007) calculated effective collision strengths for Fe xx between 302 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 2.0−8.3 K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of energy levels of the target ion and the temperature range of the effective collision strength vary significantly. For instance, Tayal (2007) provided effective collision strengths for O ii between 47 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 3.3−5 K. Ramsbottom & Bell (1997) obtained effective collision strengths for Mg vi between 23 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 5.0−6.1 K. Liang et al (2011) provided effective collision strengths for S x between 84 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 4.3−8.3 K. Witthoeft et al (2007) calculated effective collision strengths for Fe xx between 302 energy levels over a temperature range of 10 2.0−8.3 K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such analysis is worth performing only for highly accurate calculations. Many previous calculations were focused on providing collisional data and the atomic structure was evaluated with CI-based methods (Bhatia & Landi 2003a,b; Witthoeft et al 2007; Landi & Bathia 2008; Ludlow et al 2010; Liang et al 2010, 2011, 2012; Elabidi et al 2012). A large portion of such calculations has been collected in the CHIANTI v8 database (Dere et al 1997; Del Zanna et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple spectroscopic techniques have been used, including measurements with the beam-foil technique (Langenberg et al 1980; Yang et al 1980, 2009), lasers (Fawcett et al 1970; Fawcett & Hayes 1973, 1987; Faenov et al 1994), heavy-ion storage rings (Schippers et al 2012) and electron beam ion traps (EBIT) (Lepson & Beiersdorfer 2005; Beiersdorfer et al 2014; Hell et al 2016; Beiersdorfer et al 2017). On the theoretical/computational side, a large body of work has been performed, from systematic calculations of L-shell ions of S (Bhatia & Landi 2003a,b; Karpuškiene˙ et al 2005; Landi & Bathia 2008; Palmeri et al 2008; Luna et al 2009; Martins et al 2009; Fan et al 2009; Liang et al 2011; Pagan et al 2011; Elabidi et al 2012; Li et al 2013; Hell et al 2016) to isoelectronic sequence of various L-shell ions (Witthoeft et al 2007; Jönsson et al 2011; Liang et al 2012; Rynkunb et al 2012; Jönsson et al 2014; Rynkunb et al 2014; Nazé et al 2014; Wang et al 2014, 2015, 2017); see Fan et al (2009) and references therein for a short account of other calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a large amount of data collected by space-based observatories, such as XMM-Newton, Chandra X-ray observatory and Hubble space telescope, highlighted the need of accurate atomic data for the investigation and classification of the spectra from astrophysical plasma [1][2][3] and laboratory plasmas [4]. In light of the high cosmic abundance of sulfur [5][6][7], many researchers have earlier investigated transition data and spectral lines from sulfur ions experimentally [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and theoretically [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In laboratory measurements, most of the earlier published work on the spectra of low-lying multi-excited states in sulfur ions was obtained by beam-foil spectroscopic technique [8][9][10][11][12] and laser spectroscopy technique [13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical studies include the configuration interaction (CI) method of Ho and Henry [21] and Tayal [22], who used the CIV3 code; and the work of Galavís et al [23] and Elabidi et al [24], who employed the SUPERSTRUCTURE code. Liang et al [25][26] calculated the electron impact excitation data for highly-charged sulfur ions [25] for Na + to Kr 26+ including S 6+ and [26] for S 8+ to S 11+ , using the intermediate coupling frame transformation R-matrix approach. Chen et al [27][28] calculated the K-shell Auger transition energies, transition probabilities, and Kα x-ray from the sulfur ions by the multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock (MCDF) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%