2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ramr: an R/Bioconductor package for detection of rare aberrantly methylated regions

Abstract: Motivation With recent advances in the field of epigenetics, the focus is widening from large and frequent disease- or phenotype-related methylation signatures to rare alterations transmitted mitotically or transgenerationally (constitutional epimutations). Merging evidence indicate that such constitutional alterations, albeit occurring at a low mosaic level, may confer risk of disease later in life. Given their inherently low incidence rate and mosaic nature, there is a need for bioinformati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this approach is suitable for addressing large differences in DNA methylation profiles between two sets of case and control samples, it lacks sensitivity for low-level mosaic methylation detection, as the detection is hindered by sometimes much more common biological variation (11, 12) or technical artefacts (13, 14). Moreover, the lack of haplotype linkage makes such analysis difficult in tiling array-based data sets, and therefore requires nontrivial approaches (15). In contrast, analysis of NGS-based data can provide much higher sensitivity when the base-resolution methylation data is combined with information on allelic belongingness (epihaplotype linkage).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this approach is suitable for addressing large differences in DNA methylation profiles between two sets of case and control samples, it lacks sensitivity for low-level mosaic methylation detection, as the detection is hindered by sometimes much more common biological variation (11, 12) or technical artefacts (13, 14). Moreover, the lack of haplotype linkage makes such analysis difficult in tiling array-based data sets, and therefore requires nontrivial approaches (15). In contrast, analysis of NGS-based data can provide much higher sensitivity when the base-resolution methylation data is combined with information on allelic belongingness (epihaplotype linkage).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%