I Really did That

Bergström-Lehtovirta, Joanna; Coyle, David; Knibbe, Jarrod; Hornbæk, Kasper

doi:10.1145/3173574.3173952

Cited by 29 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, how does one design a technology that truly provides the experience of "I did that" rather than "The tool did that for me"? Intentional binding provides us with a tool from neuroscience for evaluating these phenomenas quantitatively [14,9]. However, we find that the design space is not yet well understood as more and more interfaces find new configurations for shared agency [34].…”

Section: Designing For Variable Agencymentioning

confidence: 88%

Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

Mueller

Lopes

Strohmeier

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Designing For Variable Agencymentioning

confidence: 88%

Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

Mueller

Lopes

Strohmeier

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since the IB paradigm has been widely employed in the literature; demonstrated to be a viable metric to implicitly assess the SoA [67], and it has been recently employed in HCI to measure agency for different input commands and system feedback [11,21,24], we employed this method for our study.…”

Section: The Sense Of Agencymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A recent study has shown that if a system does not support agency, the user might feel discouraged from using it [61]. Within human-computer interaction (HCI) research, it has been shown that on-skin input [45] produces higher SoA than keyboard and touchpad inputs [11,24], and that auditory and haptic feedback elicit higher SoA than visual feedback only [21]. However, the role of smell on agency remains unknown.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SmellControl: The Study of Sense of Agency in Smell

Cornelio

Maggioni

Brianza

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sense of Agency (SoA) is crucial in interaction with technology, it refers to the feeling of 'I did that' as opposed to 'the system did that' supporting a feeling of being in control. Research in human-computer interaction has recently studied agency in visual, auditory and haptic interfaces, however the role of smell on agency remains unknown. Our sense of smell is quite powerful to elicit emotions, memories and awareness of the environment, which has been exploited to enhance user experiences (e.g., in VR and driving scenarios). In light of increased interest in designing multimodal interfaces including smell and its close link with emotions, we investigated, for the first time, the effect of smellinduced emotions on the SoA. We conducted a study using the Intentional Binding (IB) paradigm used to measure SoA while participants were exposed to three scents with different valence (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral). Our results show that participants' SoA increased with a pleasant scent compared to neutral and unpleasant scents. We discuss how our results can inform the design of multimodal and future olfactory interfaces.

show abstract

“…Wagner et al [64] introduced a body-centric design space to describe, classify and compare different multisurface interaction techniques. Prior work reported on the various input modalities and user preferences for on-skin input [73], identified user strategies for creating on-body gestures [51] and revealed that on-skin input increased the sense of agency [5].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Like A Second Skin

Nittala

Kruttwig

Lee

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging class of epidermal devices opens up new opportunities for skin-based sensing, computing, and interaction. Future design of these devices requires an understanding of how skin-worn devices affect the natural tactile perception. In this study, we approach this research challenge by proposing a novel classification system for epidermal devices based on flexural rigidity and by testing advanced adhesive materials, including tattoo paper and thin films of poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). We report on the results of three psychophysical experiments that investigated the effect of epidermal devices of different rigidity on passive and active tactile perception. We analyzed human tactile sensitivity thresholds, two-point discrimination thresholds, and roughness discrimination abilities on three different body locations (fingertip, hand, forearm). Generally, a correlation was found between device rigidity and tactile sensitivity thresholds as well as roughness discrimination ability. Surprisingly, thin epidermal devices based on PDMS with a hundred times the rigidity of commonly used tattoo paper resulted in comparable levels of tactile acuity. The material offers the benefit of increased robustness against wear and the option to re-use the device. Based on our findings, we derive design recommendations for epidermal devices that combine tactile perception with device robustness. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User studies; Interaction devices; Empirical studies in HCI; Haptic devices.

show abstract

I Really did That

Cited by 29 publications

References 23 publications

Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

SmellControl: The Study of Sense of Agency in Smell

Like A Second Skin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About