2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01035.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retracted: Dynamics of Unclosed Triangles in Alliance Networks: Disappearance of Brokerage Positions and Performance Consequences

Abstract: We depart from previous research on brokerage advantages in interorganizational networks by shifting focus to the dynamics of brokerage positions. We investigate causes of the disappearance of these positions and its influence on organizational performance. Using a subnetwork consisting of a broker and its two partners as the unit of analysis, we postulate that the brokerage position disappears either when the two partners develop ties or when the ties between the broker and the partners dissolve. We predict t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the exception of the descriptive contributions [25], increasing attention has recently been paid to the appearance, persistence and extinction of these bridging positions [26][27][28][29][30]. Additionally, in spite of the dynamic conceptualization of the phenomena, measurements and empirical data have mainly remained within the realm of static approaches [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the exception of the descriptive contributions [25], increasing attention has recently been paid to the appearance, persistence and extinction of these bridging positions [26][27][28][29][30]. Additionally, in spite of the dynamic conceptualization of the phenomena, measurements and empirical data have mainly remained within the realm of static approaches [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with this conclusion, the work of Park and Russo (1996) on JV reaches a contrary result and justifies the greater chance of success in MPAs due to the previous experience of collaboration and the embeddedness of companies in certain subnetwork (Uzzi, 1996), with a greater commitment to these subnetworks than to other subnetworks of the industry (Min & Mitsuhashi, 2012). Consequently, the possible involvement of a company in an MPA is influenced both by the connections that a company maintains with other firms which regularly take part in MPAs and by the past alliances that the firm has carried out with these companies (Sakakibara, 2002).…”
Section: Multipartner Alliances Versus Dyadic Alliancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to these topics, studies have been conducted on a particular type of MPA, called triad alliances (Madhavan, Gnyawali & He 2004;Min & Mitsuhashi 2012). These have focused mainly on structural holes and brokerage activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, an alliance between two airlines was considered to exist in cases where they had entered into a codeshare agreement (Min & Mitsuhashi, 2012). A codeshare allows an airline to sell seats to its clients on the flights of another company with which it has the agreement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%