2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03800.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RHCE*ceTI encodes partial c and partial e and is often in cis to RHD*DIVa

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the Rh blood group system, variant RhD and RhCE express several partial antigens. We investigated RH in samples with partial DIVa that demonstrated weak and variable reactivity with anti‐C. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Standard hemagglutination techniques, polymerase chain reaction–based assays, and RH sequencing were used. RESULTS: DNA analysis showed that six red blood cell (RBC) samples with weak and inconsistent reactivity with anti‐C lacked RHCE*C, but all had RHD*DIVa, which encodes partial D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typing of the RBCs with multiple reagents, and RH genotyping on 40, revealed 30 discrepancies associated with partial, weak, or variant Rh antigen expression. This is consistent with the variability in detection of partial Rh antigens by the source reagents on automated PK7300 as we have previously observed, as well as false positive serologic C typing previously reported . For 12 C discrepant samples that were RH genotyped, the following alleles were implicated; RHCE*CeRN (n = 7); RHD*DIVa (n = 2); RHD*D‐CE(4‐7)‐D ( r'S type 2) (n = 1), RHCE*CE (RZ) (n = 1), and one with no changes with weak C expression undergoing further investigation (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typing of the RBCs with multiple reagents, and RH genotyping on 40, revealed 30 discrepancies associated with partial, weak, or variant Rh antigen expression. This is consistent with the variability in detection of partial Rh antigens by the source reagents on automated PK7300 as we have previously observed, as well as false positive serologic C typing previously reported . For 12 C discrepant samples that were RH genotyped, the following alleles were implicated; RHCE*CeRN (n = 7); RHD*DIVa (n = 2); RHD*D‐CE(4‐7)‐D ( r'S type 2) (n = 1), RHCE*CE (RZ) (n = 1), and one with no changes with weak C expression undergoing further investigation (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Of these, seven were weak false positive C typing by the hospital, six of which were associated with RBCs having a Go(a+) phenotype encoded by RHD*DIVa . As we previously reported, weak reactivity is sometimes observed with Immucor Gamma‐Clone anti‐C with RBCs with this RH genotype, but the RBCs are non‐reactive with Ortho Bioclone, Bio‐Rad Seraclone, and Diagast P3X25513G8 . The same pattern of weak false positive reactivity with Immucor Gamma‐Clone anti‐C, while non‐reactive with all other anti‐C tested, was seen in a sample shown to have RHD*DAU5‐RHCE*ce254G .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Rh epitopes and Rh antigen specificities are complex, may be crossreactive with other Rh antigens, and are not always straightforward. RhD-like epitopes, reactive with anti-D, can be expressed on altered Rhce proteins, 31,37 C-like epitopes on variant RhD and Rhce proteins, 32,38 and E-like antigens on RhCe proteins. 39 Thus, future studies will address whether RBCs from African American donors stimulate complex Rh specificities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two others in agreement (P1, P8) had a novel allele with additional changes and were concordant as RHD hemi‐ and homozygotes, respectively. The sixth (P13) has RHD*DIVa, which is reported to be false‐positive for the 1.5‐kb product in the absence of deletion of RHD . Among the samples with discordant RHD zygosity (Table ), P2 had two RHD alleles by Rh‐cDNA analysis ( RHD*DAU0/D ) but Pst I‐RFLP predicted the sample was hemizygous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%