2022
DOI: 10.1017/nps.2022.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russkiias the NewRossiiskii? Nation-Building in Russia After 1991

Abstract: Russia’s post-1991 nation-building project has been torn between competing interpretations of national identity. Whereas the other former Soviet republics opted for nation-building centered on the titular nation, Russia’s approach to national identity was framed by the fact that the RSFSR had been defined not as a designated national homeland but as a multi-ethnic federation. This, coupled with Russia’s definition as the legal successor of the Soviet Union, suggesting continuity and a history of uninterrupted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both from a top-down elite perspective and bottom-up societal approach, scholars remark on how belonging to the Russian nation is imagined and mythologised, such as via multi-ethnic discourses, and how this demonstrates its civilizational components [12,13]. However, Blakkisrud argues that while Russian nationalism might appear civilisational, it is still ethnic in content [14]. For example, while civilisational rhetoric is frequently anchored in ethnocultural terms and appeals, as the Russian regime's rhetoric towards Crimea (e.g., 'KrymNash' / 'Crimea is ours') demonstrates [14].…”
Section: The Ideology Of Russian Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Both from a top-down elite perspective and bottom-up societal approach, scholars remark on how belonging to the Russian nation is imagined and mythologised, such as via multi-ethnic discourses, and how this demonstrates its civilizational components [12,13]. However, Blakkisrud argues that while Russian nationalism might appear civilisational, it is still ethnic in content [14]. For example, while civilisational rhetoric is frequently anchored in ethnocultural terms and appeals, as the Russian regime's rhetoric towards Crimea (e.g., 'KrymNash' / 'Crimea is ours') demonstrates [14].…”
Section: The Ideology Of Russian Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Blakkisrud argues that while Russian nationalism might appear civilisational, it is still ethnic in content [14]. For example, while civilisational rhetoric is frequently anchored in ethnocultural terms and appeals, as the Russian regime's rhetoric towards Crimea (e.g., 'KrymNash' / 'Crimea is ours') demonstrates [14].…”
Section: The Ideology Of Russian Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hans München-tale fra 2007 trekkes også ofte frem som et symbol på et tidsskille der sporene til dagens politikk legges. Utviklingen av en stadig mer nasjonalistisk retorikk i Kreml peker i samme retning (Blakkisrud, 2022).…”
Section: Materialitet Og Praksiserunclassified