The monogenean Ligophorus chabaudi was originally described on the gills of the flathead mullet, Mugil cephalus, and was subsequently reported on the So-iuy mullet, Mugil soiuy. However, the morphology of sclerotized parts and multivariate statistical analyses suggest that the form from the So-iuy mullet represents a new species. This study provides a description of the new species Ligophorus pilengas n. sp. and provides additional morphological data concerning the morphology of the ventral bar that might be useful for the diagnosis of Ligophorus. Ligophorus pilengas n. sp. is the second species of Ligophorus reported on the So-iuy mullet. Zoogeographical records indicate that L. pilengas n. sp. was probably introduced to the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov from the western Pacific Ocean together with its host. Euzet and Suriano (1977) Dmitrieva and Gerasev, 1996; Ligophorus hamulosus Pan, 1999; and Ligophorus ellochelon Yang, 2001 (Euzet andSanfilippo, 1983; Gusev, 1985;Dmitrieva and Gerasev, 1996;Zhang et al. 2003). Euzet and Suriano (1977) considered that all species of Ligophorus are oioxenic, which seemed substantiated by ensuing studies (Euzet and Sanfilippo, 1983;Radujković and Raibaut, 1989; Caltran et al., 1995; Caillot et al., 1999). However, current records show that at least some species are stenoxenic. For instance, L. kaohsianghsieni, whose typical host is the So-iuy mullet, Mugil soiuy Basilewsky, has also been reported on the flathead mullet, Mugil cephalus L., and golden gray mullet, Liza aurata (Risso) (Dmitrieva, 1996;Miroshnichenko and Maltsev, 1998). Likewise, L. vanbenedenii, common on L. aurata, has also been recorded on M. cephalus, and L. macrocolpos, typical on the leaping mullet, Liza saliens (Risso), occurs also on L. aurata (Dmitrieva and Gerasev, 1996). However, the prevalence and abundance on such alternative hosts is much lower than those on the typical host of each species of Ligophorus. Apparently, the only exception to this pattern is L. chabaudi be- cause it occurs typically on M. cephalus; however, according to previous studies and our own data, it also shows high prevalence (87-100%) and abundance (up to 736 individuals) on adult So-iuy mullets (Dmitrieva, 1996; Sarabeev and Domnich, 2000).In this article, we compared the morphology of haptoral and genital sclerotized parts and conducted a linear discriminant analysis of metrical features of putative L. chabaudi from M. cephalus and M. soiuy. The results suggest that the form from M. soiuy probably represents a new species, Ligophorus pilengas n. sp., which is described in this article.