2019
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus aureus Infection in a Pediatric ICU: A Hospital Based Prospective Observational Study

Abstract: Introduction Admission to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infection is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. There is paucity of data about epidemiology of SA infection in a PICU. This study was aimed at elucidating the clinicoepidemiological profile and outcome of children admitted to ICU with S. aureus infection. Methods This study was carried out in a PICU a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inappropriate vancomycin utilization in our centre corresponds with studies in both adult and pediatric critical care settings [ 35 , 36 ]. Vancomycin prescription has been increasing in critical care settings, due to the risk of community and hospital acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [ 37 , 38 ]. Several strategies to control vancomycin use in critical care units have been proposed; negative MRSA surveillance swabs were found to have a high negative predictive value for subsequent MRSA infections [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate vancomycin utilization in our centre corresponds with studies in both adult and pediatric critical care settings [ 35 , 36 ]. Vancomycin prescription has been increasing in critical care settings, due to the risk of community and hospital acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [ 37 , 38 ]. Several strategies to control vancomycin use in critical care units have been proposed; negative MRSA surveillance swabs were found to have a high negative predictive value for subsequent MRSA infections [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%