2016
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus lugdunensis: an unusual and aggressive cause of infective endocarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as all these three CoNS species belong to the S. epidermidis group as part of the normal skin flora with similar pathogenicity [20] it is not mandatory to identify these CoNS on the species level. Worth mentioning is the inclusion of S. lugdunensis in the Genmark ePlex® panel as it is a common pathogen with species specific virulence factors [21] associated with aggressive causes of infective endocarditis [22][23][24]. In addition, two E. faecalis isolates were misidentified as E. faecium.…”
Section: Identification Of Gram-positive Bsi Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as all these three CoNS species belong to the S. epidermidis group as part of the normal skin flora with similar pathogenicity [20] it is not mandatory to identify these CoNS on the species level. Worth mentioning is the inclusion of S. lugdunensis in the Genmark ePlex® panel as it is a common pathogen with species specific virulence factors [21] associated with aggressive causes of infective endocarditis [22][23][24]. In addition, two E. faecalis isolates were misidentified as E. faecium.…”
Section: Identification Of Gram-positive Bsi Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. lugdunensis is a life-threatening pathogen and causes prosthetic device-associated endocarditis, which has a high mortality rate ( Flores Umanzor et al., 2016 ; Ishiekwene et al., 2017 ). Previous studies have shown that S. lugdunensis can interact with platelets through binding of the surface protein vWbl to vWf ( Nilsson et al., 2004 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%