2014
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00012314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TLNO/TLCOratio is not the end of the road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, caution should be exercised when looking at the ratio alone, since an apparently normal value could result from both DLNO and DLCO being low, and in addition a low ratio could of course either result from a low value of DLNO or a high value of DLCO, while the opposite could apply to a high ratio. Furthermore, the scatter of the normal values for the ratio is rather large (mean±SD 4.4±0.24), and for patients the scatter of values is also found to be large [39,40]. Obviously, this might result in difficulties differentiating between normal and pathological values.…”
Section: Dlno/dlcomentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, caution should be exercised when looking at the ratio alone, since an apparently normal value could result from both DLNO and DLCO being low, and in addition a low ratio could of course either result from a low value of DLNO or a high value of DLCO, while the opposite could apply to a high ratio. Furthermore, the scatter of the normal values for the ratio is rather large (mean±SD 4.4±0.24), and for patients the scatter of values is also found to be large [39,40]. Obviously, this might result in difficulties differentiating between normal and pathological values.…”
Section: Dlno/dlcomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This has led researchers who previously regarded θNO to be infinite to consider it finite with a value of 4. [4,6,39].…”
Section: θCo θNo and αmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On theoretical basis, θ NO /θ CO ratio ( k ) cannot be lower than the DL NO /DL CO ratio which maximal published value in healthy human is 6·5 (Martinot and Guénard, ). θ CO recommended value in normoxia is about 0·58 (Forster, ) as the recent consensus on θ NO led to a value of 4·5 (both values in ml gas × min −1 × mmHg −1 ml −1 blood).…”
Section: Reconsidering the ‘Classic’ Roughton–forster (Rf) Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%