2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Authors reply: “Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry: gold standard for muscle mass?” by Scafoglieri et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, when analyzed individually, the relation of BMI with mortality and ALM/ht 2 with mortality was very strikingly similar. This may lead some to conclude that BMI is a surrogate measure of muscle mass, as DXA lean mass is often used as an approximation of muscle mass [34]. However, lean mass by DXA is not a direct measure of muscle mass [35] and is only modestly related to mortality in other projects [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, when analyzed individually, the relation of BMI with mortality and ALM/ht 2 with mortality was very strikingly similar. This may lead some to conclude that BMI is a surrogate measure of muscle mass, as DXA lean mass is often used as an approximation of muscle mass [34]. However, lean mass by DXA is not a direct measure of muscle mass [35] and is only modestly related to mortality in other projects [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), recognized as the gold standard for body composition assessment [ 36 , 37 ], was used to measure fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM). Prior to each measurement session, the DXA equipment (Hologic, Inc., Model Discovery QDR-Series-Wi; nª 84894, Marlborough, MA, USA) was calibrated to maintain the precision and accuracy of the scanner, with a certified clinical densitometrist (CM) performing all DXA data collection and analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%