2024
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2361805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kitchen assessment : an interactional analysis of assessment and feedback between an occupational therapist and a patient with aphasia post stroke

Deborah Hersh,
Claire Morrisby,
Brooke Ryan
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the late 1990s/early 2000s, this resulted in an increasing interest generally in more naturally occurring conversations than constructed assessment scenarios, but utilized more theoretical sociolinguistic frameworks for analysis, e.g., Conversation Analysis Ferguson, 1996;Simmons-Mackie & Damico, 2009) and Systemic Functional Linguistic approaches (Armstrong & Mortensen, 2006). This approach has continued to develop to the present day (Beeke & Bloch, 2023;Groenewold & Armstrong, 2018;Hersh et al, 2018Hersh et al, , 2024Tuomenoksa et al, 2023;Wilkinson, 2015). While the examination of the language of a particular speaker in a monologic context tells us a lot about the speaker's language "system" and access to certain types of word and sentence processing, it is during everyday interactions that the speaker's true sociolinguistic strengths and weaknesses become apparent.…”
Section: Incorporating a More Interactional Focus To Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the late 1990s/early 2000s, this resulted in an increasing interest generally in more naturally occurring conversations than constructed assessment scenarios, but utilized more theoretical sociolinguistic frameworks for analysis, e.g., Conversation Analysis Ferguson, 1996;Simmons-Mackie & Damico, 2009) and Systemic Functional Linguistic approaches (Armstrong & Mortensen, 2006). This approach has continued to develop to the present day (Beeke & Bloch, 2023;Groenewold & Armstrong, 2018;Hersh et al, 2018Hersh et al, , 2024Tuomenoksa et al, 2023;Wilkinson, 2015). While the examination of the language of a particular speaker in a monologic context tells us a lot about the speaker's language "system" and access to certain types of word and sentence processing, it is during everyday interactions that the speaker's true sociolinguistic strengths and weaknesses become apparent.…”
Section: Incorporating a More Interactional Focus To Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%