2001
DOI: 10.7748/nr2001.07.8.4.4.c6162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the Delphi as a research approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although good reliability has been demonstrated with consensus techniques using groups with similar professional compositions, variations could produce different results . For example, Delphi studies conducted with 'expert' practitioners increasingly include service user representatives on the panel (Mead and Moseley 2001;Baker et al, 2006), but this study did not. While not experts in the technique itself, service users potentially bring a unique perspective on the types of skills required to be an excellent practitioner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although good reliability has been demonstrated with consensus techniques using groups with similar professional compositions, variations could produce different results . For example, Delphi studies conducted with 'expert' practitioners increasingly include service user representatives on the panel (Mead and Moseley 2001;Baker et al, 2006), but this study did not. While not experts in the technique itself, service users potentially bring a unique perspective on the types of skills required to be an excellent practitioner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sampling is a fundamental methodological concern when using Delphi technique, as credibility depends on the perceived expertise of the panel (Green et al, 1999;Mead and Moseley, 2001;Cornick, 2006;Keeney et al, 2010). The panel's expertise was of fundamental importance to achieving the local aims of the research in supporting an innovative midwifery role expansion.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way a focused, in depth exploration of the area in question can develop and/or a consensus can be reached, should it be required (Skulmoski et al, 2007). Additionally the transparent and specified process of the Delphi technique means that not only can the study be fully auditable by others (Mead & Moseley, 2001), but also that, due to the collaborative nature of the methodology, panel members can repeatedly check their disseminated comments for accuracy throughout the study (Skulmoski et al, 2007), adding validity to the study through participant validation (Silverman, 2006, p. 292). I therefore decided that using the Delphi technique would produce focused and rich material that would thoroughly illuminate supervision issues for therapists working with trauma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method enables the researcher to utilise the views and opinions of a group of recognised experts in the field of study. 6 A Delphi study typically consists of a number of phases, but there are no strict criteria for the way in which it is organised; 7 we used a four-stage mixed methods approach. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Plymouth University Ethics Committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%