2006
DOI: 10.1107/s1600536806014619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

trans-Bromocarbonylbis(triphenylphosphine)rhodium

Abstract: Key indicatorsSingle-crystal X-ray study T = 100 K Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å Disorder in main residue R factor = 0.018 wR factor = 0.047 Data-to-parameter ratio = 19.5For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rh−Br and Rh−S distances in molecules A and B of 2 are also notably different; Rh−Br is 2.4519(11) Å in molecule A and 2.5161(11) Å in molecule B, while Rh−S is 2.380(2) Å in molecule A and 2.304(2) Å in molecule B. The shorter Rh−Br distance in molecule A is similar to those in closely related [RhBr(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] (2.453 Å) and [ n Bu 4 N][RhBr(NBD)( i Pr 2 P(C 6 H 4 )BPh 3 - p )] (NBD = norbornadiene) (2.465 Å) . However, Rh−Br in molecule B is more comparable with that in [RhBr(CO)(Me 2 carbox)] [Me 2 carbox = 1-(4,4-dimethyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)-3-mesitylimidazol-2-ylidene] (2.507 Å) in which the bromo ligand experiences the high trans -influence of an N -heterocyclic carbene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The Rh−Br and Rh−S distances in molecules A and B of 2 are also notably different; Rh−Br is 2.4519(11) Å in molecule A and 2.5161(11) Å in molecule B, while Rh−S is 2.380(2) Å in molecule A and 2.304(2) Å in molecule B. The shorter Rh−Br distance in molecule A is similar to those in closely related [RhBr(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] (2.453 Å) and [ n Bu 4 N][RhBr(NBD)( i Pr 2 P(C 6 H 4 )BPh 3 - p )] (NBD = norbornadiene) (2.465 Å) . However, Rh−Br in molecule B is more comparable with that in [RhBr(CO)(Me 2 carbox)] [Me 2 carbox = 1-(4,4-dimethyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)-3-mesitylimidazol-2-ylidene] (2.507 Å) in which the bromo ligand experiences the high trans -influence of an N -heterocyclic carbene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Specifically, square-planar ML 2 (CO)­X compounds may exhibit disorder between pairs of mutually trans CO and X ligands and this type of disorder can result in an artificial apparent lengthening of the Ir–CO bond that is cis to the NHC ligand. ,, An illustration of the ability of disorder to influence the Ir–CO bond lengths in this system is provided by the fact that there are several derivatives that possess more than one crystallographically independent molecule in the asymmetric unit and, for these structures, the Ir–CO bond lengths for the ligands that are trans to Cl are significantly different. For example, the Ir–CO bond lengths for the carbonyl groups that are cis to the NHC ligand in the two crystallographically independent molecules of (SIPr)­Ir­(CO) 2 Cl differ considerably, namely 1.855(6) and 1.959(4) Å, whereas those that are trans to the NHC ligand are much more similar, namely 1.872(5) and 1.883(5) Å .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%