2019
DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2019.1595537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two more takes on the critical: Intersectional and interdisciplinary scholarship grounded in family histories and the Asia-Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown and Au (2014) draw from the theories of cultural memory and critical race theory to contextualize how the histories of race and curriculum are portrayed in the United States. Although curriculum research attends to the intersectionality of race, culture, gender, class, sexuality, and so on, more work supporting Asian American children and youth needs to be done (Au, 2022; Chang, 2019; Goodwin, 2010; Lee, 2009). It is not simply a matter of adding supplemental materials to the existing curriculum, but rather it is about reframing the curriculum through AsianCrit and transnationalism frameworks.…”
Section: Reconstructing Activism and Curriculum With Asiancrit And Tr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown and Au (2014) draw from the theories of cultural memory and critical race theory to contextualize how the histories of race and curriculum are portrayed in the United States. Although curriculum research attends to the intersectionality of race, culture, gender, class, sexuality, and so on, more work supporting Asian American children and youth needs to be done (Au, 2022; Chang, 2019; Goodwin, 2010; Lee, 2009). It is not simply a matter of adding supplemental materials to the existing curriculum, but rather it is about reframing the curriculum through AsianCrit and transnationalism frameworks.…”
Section: Reconstructing Activism and Curriculum With Asiancrit And Tr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within education, these pedagogies have been further refined via feminist and indigenous lenses, including through intersectional praxes of care, reflexivity, and the interrogations of the positionality and privilege of the teacher, scholar, and activist (Ladson-Billings 1996 ; Luke and Luke 1999 ; Smith 2012 ). These refinements, and the general application of critical, decolonising, and womanist lenses to Asian communities in education (Asher 2007 ; Chang 2019 ; Coloma 2006 ), help provide a helpful foundation through which to examine the complicated positionalities of Asian communities amidst predominantly Black and POC activist spaces. This foundation also helps illuminate the significance of Asian/Asian American histories and pedagogies of activism towards more dynamic, inclusive, and equitable efforts in popular education, protest, and organising.…”
Section: Foundations In Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These learning opportunities were further nuanced in ‘going back to the motherland’ of Hong Kong as a Chinese American with elite credentials, which immediately positioned me within the dominant ‘race’. Nuances emerged from this majoritised positionality when advocating for equity with ‘ethnic minorities’ and other marginalised groups in a region where White supremacy ideology persists, where Han Chineseness is increasingly akin to Whiteness in numerous ways (Gutiérrez 2006 ; Lee and Law 2016 ), and the ‘new coloniser’ can be considered Chinese (Chang 2019 ; Chen 2010 ). A general example of this concerns how Chinese diaspora or ‘returnees’ to Greater China (China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan), who typically grew up as minoritised peoples abroad (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars from various backgrounds recognize the potency of CFH as pedagogical tools of transformation that include deep introspection that accompanies historical research on one's family of origin. The scholar Chang (2019) writes that if we are to actually start and sustain the organic groundwork of social change, with all of its tensions, let-downs, and contradictions, it is crucial to meet all stakeholders at eye-level, talk-story about where our families come from and where we wish to go, and be caring, reflexive, and intersectional as we develop our pedagogies and methodologies for change. (p. 167)…”
Section: Critical Family Histories As a Tool Of Transformative Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%