and in various posts and positions in the Swedish government including being a member of the Swedish Parliament, an ambassador to India, as well as one of first female ministers in Sweden despite her career being delayed and at times overshadowed due to gender roles and expectations. Myrdal also was awarded the Albert Einstein Peace Prize (1980) and Nobel Peace Prize (1982). Although she was not without controversy, I believe Myrdal is salient to the work of public interest communications (PIC) because she used her unique perspective and experiences as a researcher, mother, and wife to enact change. Through her research she took what was very private, such as the division of home labor, work-life balance, and child care and made the topics public though debate, dialogue, political agendas, and policy. Therefore, I concur with Ekerwald (2000) that Myrdal's work is an "inspiration for finding solutions for societal problems" (p. 351) because Myrdal used clear arguments, careful analysis, broad experience, a range of theoretical perspectives, and scientific thinking to command people to consider different points of views to initiate change. In this issue of the Journal of Public Interest Communications, the authors' work seems to center around the question, "What happens when we make the private public?" By analyzing Myrdal's research style, we can further probe and investigate this important question. Myrdal reformulated problems to allow for examining them from new and different perspectives (Ekerwald, 2000). One way to give light to new perspectives is through transparency. Austin et al.'s article allows readers to view the types of transparency social media