2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I was obligated to accept”: A qualitative exploration of contraceptive coercion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
145
0
13

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
145
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the myriad positive outcomes for individuals' health and socioeconomic well-being associated with using contraception, facilitating access to the full range of contraceptive methods available for people who wish to avoid pregnancy should continue to be high priority, especially in the current political climate. Perhaps even more importantly, to align with the core tenets of patient-centered care (33), people should be able to select contraceptive methods based on informed, voluntary, and full personal choice (34), not because a health care provider, public health professional, or legislator prioritizes a particular method over others (35)(36)(37). Health care providers have a key role to play in helping their patients make fully informed choices about contraceptive methods, as patients themselves indicate that they put a lot of stock in the opinions of their doctors (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the myriad positive outcomes for individuals' health and socioeconomic well-being associated with using contraception, facilitating access to the full range of contraceptive methods available for people who wish to avoid pregnancy should continue to be high priority, especially in the current political climate. Perhaps even more importantly, to align with the core tenets of patient-centered care (33), people should be able to select contraceptive methods based on informed, voluntary, and full personal choice (34), not because a health care provider, public health professional, or legislator prioritizes a particular method over others (35)(36)(37). Health care providers have a key role to play in helping their patients make fully informed choices about contraceptive methods, as patients themselves indicate that they put a lot of stock in the opinions of their doctors (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key principle of high-quality client-provider interactions related to family planning services is provider respect for women's fertility plans and family planning preferences [16]. Global and country-specific targets calling for increased contraceptive use to reduce unmet need for family planning, including use of longer-acting methods, have posed challenges to ensuring quality counseling on all family planning methods and respect for women's use of preferred methods, while aiming to achieve these targets [17][18][19]. As a response, recent research and practice has renewed attention towards improving the quality of reproductive health care services through emphasis of client-centered care [8,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global and country-specific targets calling for increased contraceptive use to reduce unmet need for family planning, including use of longer-acting methods, have posed challenges to ensuring quality counseling on all family planning methods and respect for women's use of preferred methods, while aiming to achieve these targets [17][18][19]. As a response, recent research and practice has renewed attention towards improving the quality of reproductive health care services through emphasis of client-centered care [8,19,20]. To date, however, there is a dearth of research on quality of family planning services specific to low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where achieving national demographic targets may take precedence over women's individual fertility intentions and contraceptive preferences [19,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, the decision to receive contraception at the time could have been in uenced by subtle peer pressure from other parturient women or coercion by clinicians is unclear in the present study. Future studies should examine the effect of providers' bias and coercion on the choices of contraception in the region, given South Africa's history and a body of literature establishing contraceptive coercion [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%