1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-21637-8_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IAC—DIDAS—L A Dynamic Interactive Decision Analysis and Support System for Multicriteria Analysis of Linear and Dynamic Linear Models on Professional Microcomputers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This formulation can be interpreted as a generalized goal programming Ð equivalent to the classical goal programming if all objectives are stabilized, but with the advantage that all solutions of the problem (9) are nondominated with respect to the appropriately defined positive cone, which cannot be guaranteed in classical goal programming. Such a reference point or aspiration-led approach to multi-objective linear programming has been used, for example, in the programming package for multiple-objective analysis and decision support DIDAS-L for linear models (see Rogowski et al (1989); similar forms have been used earlier by many authors (e.g. Wierzbicki, 1980;Nakayama and Sawaragi, 1983;Steuer and Choo, 1983)).…”
Section: Indirect Support Of Intuition In Model-based Decision Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This formulation can be interpreted as a generalized goal programming Ð equivalent to the classical goal programming if all objectives are stabilized, but with the advantage that all solutions of the problem (9) are nondominated with respect to the appropriately defined positive cone, which cannot be guaranteed in classical goal programming. Such a reference point or aspiration-led approach to multi-objective linear programming has been used, for example, in the programming package for multiple-objective analysis and decision support DIDAS-L for linear models (see Rogowski et al (1989); similar forms have been used earlier by many authors (e.g. Wierzbicki, 1980;Nakayama and Sawaragi, 1983;Steuer and Choo, 1983)).…”
Section: Indirect Support Of Intuition In Model-based Decision Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%