2013
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6s.s12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iatrogenic catheter sheath shearing during radial artery cannulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While embolization of fragments of central venous, 5 arterial, 6 and peripheral venous catheters 3 are well known, we did not find reports of an angiocatheter fragmentation during CVC insertion as described here. The exact explanation of this failure remains uncertain, but we speculate that 5 possible mechanisms could account for the observed event:…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…While embolization of fragments of central venous, 5 arterial, 6 and peripheral venous catheters 3 are well known, we did not find reports of an angiocatheter fragmentation during CVC insertion as described here. The exact explanation of this failure remains uncertain, but we speculate that 5 possible mechanisms could account for the observed event:…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…It is exceedingly rare for a portion of the catheter to dislodge or shear off. Indeed, these are such rare events, that their occurrence warrants reporting and often results in publication as case reports [ 5 , 7 , 14 - 16 ]. It is not possible to be certain about the cause of the catheter shearing, but most clinicians suspect that the shearing occurs during difficult placement of the catheter that results in catheter trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is important to note that reinsertion of any of the needles back into the catheter should be avoided given the potential risk for shearing the catheter. 4 Further study in a clinical setting will be required to determine whether the tactile sensation experienced by clinician would be similar with the new design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%