Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment Procedures

Harish, P V; Joseph, Sonila Anne; Sirajuddin, Syed; Gundapaneni, Veenadharini; Chungkham, Sachidananda; Ambica,

doi:10.2174/1874210601509010190

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is imperative to understand that a successful fixed prosthodontic practice requires knowledge of sound biological and mechanical principles involved in abutment selection and subsequent preparation techniques. Beside that the growth of desirable and acceptable manipulative skills to implement the treatment plan identified for the particular patient (9) from the beginning when you discover an error has occurred, STOP Don't proceed. Return to the step where the error occurred and correct it.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Preparation Faults Manifesting As Finish Line Defects

A. H. Mohamed

2017

Libyan J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was done to evaluate different finish line defects due to fault preparation, In addition to that to determination of their locations (upper, lower, anterior, posterior). Methods: 175 working casts with different finish line defects (common errors and mistakes happens in the finish line) were collected from various dental laboratories in Benghazi. The working casts were classifiedto five groups according to the type of the finish line defect. group (1): Unidentifiable or light finish line,group (2): The finish line Not continuous, group (3): Double or several finish lines, group (4): Rough finish line and group( 5): Nodules on finish line. The collected data have analyzed statically. Each group subdivided into two divisions (upper, lower) then each division divided into three subgroups (Anterior, premolar, Molar) according to position of tooth in the arch.Results: The percentage for incidence of each group were as follow Group (1) = 30% mostly in lower molars and upper premolars (40.4%, 32.7%) respectively. Group (2) =24% the highest percentage in lower molar (33.3%). Group (3) =16% the highest was 39.3% of them occur in lower molars also. Group (4) = 22% with (35.9%, 23.1%) in lower molars and upper molars respectively. Group (5) = 8% mostly in lower molars (35.7%). independent-samples t-test was conducted which revealed lower molars are the most significant for all the subdivisions (M13, SD5.8) t(4)=5, p=0.07Conclusion: The careful inspection of the finish line on the working cast is an essential critical step for obtaining a restoration with an accurate marginal integrity .

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Preparation Faults Manifesting As Finish Line Defects

A. H. Mohamed

2017

Libyan J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cement groups involved three samples each. properties of dental biomaterials 2,3 , as well as their toxic potential 4,5 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of antioxidant capacity of several luting cements processes by HPMC method

Ilic¹,

Obradović-Đuričić²,

Medic³

et al. 2016

Balkan J Dent Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background: Free radicals (FR) occur in oral cavity where lot of food was transferred to through entire life under specific saliva conditions. Many enzymes, microorganism, alcohol beverages, nicotine and other harmful or indifferent substances when in contact to oral tissues might provoke oxidation process under specific condition creating FRʼs. The similar role might have various dental materials.Aim: Of the study was to record the level of antioxidant (AO) activity of several permanent (P) luting cements alone or combined with quercetin AO substance.Materials/Methods: P cements were Zn-phosphate, Zn-polycarboxilate, GIC and composite resin cement. They were prepared as original prescription and their variant by 1%weight addition of quercetin. AO activity of cements was measured by HPMC test evaluated by Student t test.Results: There were statistically significant differences among Zn-phosphate, Zn-polycarboxilate and resin dental cements (p ˃ 0,05). GIC displayed significantly higher AO values (p < 0,01) versus other three cements. There were no difference in AO capacity between sample of original P cements and their corresponding quercetin variants (p ˃ 0,05).Conclusions: Conventional GIC displayed the most powerful AO activity among P luting cements. Addition of 1% antioxidant quercetin did not improve AO capacity of investigated cements.

show abstract

“…In order to successfully restore a proximal surface, it is necessary to attain marginal adaptation, marginal ridge placement, and anatomically accurate contour and contact points [ 7 ]. The preservation of periodontal health and the integrity of the dental arch are significantly influenced by the adequacy of proximal contact and marginal adaptation [ 8 ]. By maintaining tight proximal contact and optimizing reconstruction of the proximal surface, it is possible to prevent food impaction, subsequent periodontal disease, and the formation of approximal carious lesions.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Matrix Systems on the Proximal Contact of Class II Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review

Alshardan,

Rozi,

AlSenan

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When restoring proximal surfaces in posterior teeth, dentists frequently encounter the difficulty of reproducing the proximal contact that is naturally present in unrestored teeth. In order to guarantee the durability of restorations made from class II composite resin, it is imperative that both functional and aesthetic requirements are met. This entails the choice of the matrix system that replicates the optimal proximal contact subsequent to the insertion of restorations made of class II composite resin. The objective of this systematic review is to assemble current research conducted on the various matrix systems utilized in class II composite restorations and assess their impact on the pre-existing composite proximal contact. Three examiners conducted an independent electronic search utilizing the subsequent databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, and Embase. Publications on proximal contact in class II composite restorations were compiled from the time of their inception until August 2022, in accordance with predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality assessment was conducted utilizing the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) instrument. Among the six studies that were included, it was observed that the sectional matrix system generated greater proximal contact tightness than the circumferential matrix system (Tofflemire). However, no significant distinction was found between the metal and polyester matrix systems. In contrast to alternative circumferential matrix systems, the utilization of a sectional matrix system yields a statistically significant improvement in the optimum proximal contact of class II composite restorations, according to the studies.

show abstract

Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment Procedures

Cited by 11 publications

References 14 publications

The Preparation Faults Manifesting As Finish Line Defects

The Preparation Faults Manifesting As Finish Line Defects

Investigation of antioxidant capacity of several luting cements processes by HPMC method

Evaluation of Matrix Systems on the Proximal Contact of Class II Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About