Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries of the Abdomen and Pelvis: The Experience at a Hellenic University Hospital

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to present the experience of a Vascular Division at a Hellenic University hospital concerning the management of iatrogenic vascular injuries (IVIs) of the abdomen or pelvis. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating all IVIs reported during a 10-year period in our institution. Only injuries warranting a vascular surgeon consultation were included in the study. Non-iatrogenic injuries were not included. Mortality and major complications within 30 days were evaluated. Results: Overall, 70 cases were recorded, with 41% being venous and 59% being arterial injuries. Iliac arteries (51%) were the most common location and rupture/lacerations (73%) were the most common type of injury. General surgery (61.5%) and cardiology (30%) procedures were the most frequently involved procedures. A 30-day mortality was 5.7%, with 30% of cases treated conservatively. Synthetic bypass grafting (odds ratio [OR] = 65.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.022-1050.358; P = .003) and male gender (OR = 83.77; 95% CI, 4.040-1736.738; P = .004) were associated with death. Conclusions: Iatrogenic vascular injuries of the abdomen or pelvis are usually associated with general surgery and endovascular procedures. When vascular consultation is requested early, mortality could remain low. However, a selected number of stable patients with retroperitoneal or pelvic hematomas could be treated conservatively, yielding satisfying results.

Use of covered stent grafts as treatment of traumatic venous injury to the inferior vena cava and iliac veins: A systematic review

“…In another recent, large retrospective report, however, general surgery and endovascular procedures were more often the cause of abdominopelvic vascular injury. 46 It is possible that the relative inaccessibility of this iliac venous segment during lumbar spine surgery made the use of a covered stent graft more appealing than open repair. Furthermore, the data from the present cohort revealed that most venous injuries were encountered during anterior and/or revision lumbar spine surgery.…”

Editorial: Minimally invasive vascular surgery

“…Endovascular therapy has also contributed significantly to the management of vascular trauma, offering a great benefit especially for multi-trauma patients ( 3 ). Bayona et al have described an interesting case of a patient with penetrating trauma of the thoracic aorta as well as injury of other intra-abdominal structures.…”

Expert surgeons and deep learning models can predict the outcome of surgical hemorrhage from 1 min of video

“…Despite maximal efforts, including the conversion from minimally invasive to ‘open’ surgery, 13–60% of major vascular injuries result in patient death 2 – 6 . Surgeons immediately assess the likelihood of achieving hemostasis and the need for blood transfusion, however; inexperience, inability 7 – 11 and stress 1 , 3 , 12 , 13 impair decision-making. Accordingly, surgeon self-assessments of the likelihood of controlling an unexpected vascular complication are uncorrelated with their actual performance 14 .…”